nargis

joined 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Jakarta Method is a good one!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

Heh yeah. I don't particularly like the Houthis, but good god lib discourse is so annoying.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Fascism believes its own lies, I guess. Even kings had court jesters to criticise them. Trump is surrounded by dumb yes-men. I do feel sorry for the poor people caught in the mess the world is in right now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

This comment took me down an interesting rabbit hole... He's a couch fucker? And conservatives say neopronouns are weird, smh.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's the best part. These people really are complete outsiders. You expect them to be evil, but somewhat intelligent. Instead you get 👊 🇺🇸 🔥.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Narcissus poeticus, or poet's daffodils are called 'nargis' (nuh-ruh-giiis) in a a number of languages. The root word is Persian. It is often used in poetry as a metaphor for a person's eyes (generally your girlfriend) as it is supposed to be 'eye shaped'. There is, of course, the Greek myth which is often alluded to in English literature. It's also a pretty flower.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

antonim raised a good point, actually. While I wouldn't put it past the CIA to do something like this, the fact is that this vague document is hardly evidence of the CIA funding the Hungarian revolution. Besides, a historian would be far more qualified to look at archival material since they're actually trained to do that.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Less evil for whom? The Arabs who lost family and friends to this war? Once you cross the threshold of genocide, does it even matter anymore? From an Arab's perspective, it's like asking what is worse, the Tasmanian genocide (which killed every full-blooded Tasmanian by 1876) or the Armenian genocide? What does it matter when both were literally the most evil you can get?

I don't fault American women/minorities for voting in their self interest. Abortion and queer rights was an issue for many people and they voted in for their rights. That's a fault of the state. But when you lose family, friends, neighbours and country to a genocide, what does it matter? Family is the most important, after food and water. Death of family is extremely traumatic. And then telling those grieving people to go vote for a butcher against their own raging conscience and blaming them for Democrat incompetence is just evil. You voted for your self interest. They for theirs.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

people like you would probably be saying how Trump would have fucked it up so hard that there’d have been no choice but to ceasefire or some such dumb ass mental gymnastics

I sincerely doubt it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Arundhati Roy mentioned! I love her books!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, but the ready excuse for the genocides of the past is, 'That was a barbaric age, everyone was awful. We are enlightened now. See, we gave gay people rights!' Well clearly, nothing has changed. They are still barbarously cruel. But since you're from lemmy.ml, I imagine you already know.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 3 weeks ago (17 children)

The poem is beautiful. This is truly the greatest moral stain of this generation upon the West; to have supported genocide, and not any genocide but the clearest case of genocide in this supposed era of 'progress' and 'open-mindedness' There is no progress, people are clearly just as racist, imperialistic and backward as they were in the 100s of years ago. A genocide unfolded and the 'enlightened West' watched on. How will you get the blood off your hands?

view more: ‹ prev next ›