nalinna

Yep. Certainly wouldn't be the first time that something is made to seem altruistic but ultimately gets used in questionably-ethical ways.

Yes. It's utterly useless now (and they aren't being introduced into existing ecosystem to my knowledge). They view it as a proof of concept for more recently extinct species as well as a potential tool for restoring species to ecosystems in the future as extinction events pick up speed.

However, it should be noted that extinction events are a symptom, not the core problem, so I'm not sure exactly where we'd restore extinct species to, since human use of the land is the root cause of most ecosystem collapses, and it's unlikely that they can rebuild populations in the places they died out of (and the land probably won't be yielded back anyway).

Super cool stuff that they did regardless, but can't figure out how it's going to accomplish what they seem to want to accomplish.

Why would someone waste their money on this poll?

Please correct if inaccurate, but I don't see in that article where the folks at Espressif refer to it as a backdoor, only the security company. This seems to me as though it is no more vulnerable than any other device which can be compromised by physical access, which is most of devices. The vulnerability really looks to be more in the ability to pivot to other devices remotely after one has been compromised physically, which isn't ideal, but still doesn't seem to me to be any less secure than most other devices.

I was recently considering replacing my color laser printer from 2006...sounds like I'm keeping it a little longer. It's coincidentally made by brother, but I doubt they're updating that firmware anytime soon.

That's a fantastic point I hadn't considered. Thank you!

Pure conjecture here, but I certainly do wonder if the number of lawsuits would decrease if healthcare wasn't cost-prohibitive to people. I don't expect they'd go away entirely (legitimate grievances, greed, etc), but I imagine they'd probably go down quite a bit if people didn't have to wonder how to pay rent and pay to have their broken leg treated.

Thank you for the convenient link to uninstall!

Yep. Worked there for a bit. They're contractually obligated to show ads on certain content. Doesn't matter what tier you're on. As a paying customer (a rather long time ago), my partner became so incensed at the ads that played even though he paid for ad-free that he rage-cancelled his membership.

You're 100% correct and I wish the article would call that out. I was pretty disappointed when I read that at first, but I think that, not only are the union workers going to see a victory here as well, but I also suspect that we have the union to thank for the non-union pay... idustries with solid union presence tend to see improvements to both pay and work environments merely because the union is there, effectively setting a standard that has to be at least loosely followed in order to be competitive. In this case, the union isn't strong in this industry per se, but it is strong within Costco, driving the worker satisfaction up right along with it...which is a pretty great phenomenon.

This is what happens when you have good union representation and collective bargaining agreements. Great job, Teamsters!

Stay and risk having to work for a leadership committing atrocities. Leave and risk there only being loyalists working for the them, further enabling the atrocities.