ltxrtquq

In the bottom right corner you can see a Grok watermark, which would also explain why Trump isn't wearing is fake tan and why Vance's hands are also all kinds of weird.

Unfortunately, they predicted a bad actor getting access to their server/devices. Reality is even stupider since someone accidentally included a journalist in their classified group chat.

I mean, we could also just have different people share the url publicly, right?

https://lemmy.ml/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.doesnotexist.club%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F44f99f51-2ae9-49b0-b0c8-4ae4cb989690.png)

https://lemmy.doesnotexist.club/pictrs/image/44f99f51-2ae9-49b0-b0c8-4ae4cb989690.png

I'm pretty sure that's the url I was sent.

No matter which look you choose, you’ll be mighty good with the Gunslinger armor passive, which gives your secondary increased reload speed, increased draw/holster speed, and reduced recoil.

https://store.steampowered.com/news/app/553850/view/578254855150240941

It's not really a "free video game giveaway" if you need to pay for a membership to get it.

Incorporates 3rd-party DRM: Denuvo Anti-tamper 5 different PC within a day machine activation limit

Requires 3rd-Party Account: Ubisoft Account (Supports Linking to Steam Account) Requires agreement to a 3rd-party EULA

Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands EULA

From the steam page

And even if it wasn't, the amount of asphalt used in all the speed bumps in a city wouldn't last very long repairing potholes.

Magic publishers sent Pinkerton agents to a YouTuber’s house to retrieve leaked cards

When Magic: The Gathering cards turned up on YouTube last week, publisher Wizards of the Coast (which also publishes D&D) sent private investigators from Pinkerton to retrieve them. The resulting confrontation reportedly frightened one woman to tears, and resulted in the confiscation of nearly two dozen boxes of cards by private investigators. Wizards confirmed the incident to Polygon.

In case anyone else was curious what this was referring to.

spent hours on the phone explaining to constituents that our funding was cut so we couldn’t provide the services they were due

In the Pentagon? What services are the Pentagon providing that I should be calling about?

Again, 202 is about opening other people's mail/messages, with the electronic subsection being about accessing their digital messages when you aren't supposed to. And section 206 wouldn't apply to Drag at all, since they aren't even an admin. As far as I can tell, there's nothing legally wrong with sharing "private" messages that are sent to you.

Then why bring it up and say someone will correct you if you're wrong?

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.html

If this is an accurate translation of the laws, 203 is about doctors, lawyers, government officials, etc. sharing priveledged information they had access to because of their jobs and 206 only applies to owners/employees of telecommunications or delivery services.

Edit: and to go one step further, Section 201: Violation of Privacy of Spoken Word means you can't record phone calls without everyone's permission, but Section 202: Violation of Privacy of Correspondence is about opening other people's letters.