You, me, and 80 other people.
lka1988
People who didn’t vote for Harris didn’t choose Trump, they just rejected Harris.
This is part of why the 2-party system we're currently stuck with is so problematic.
Again - that is a claim. Bring a source next time.
We're in a thread talking about the only other choice we had for president vs Trump, because of what Trump is doing as president, and you're going "well aCkShYuALLy" about it.
When faced with two choices (which itself is a problem that needs to be addressed), the American people picked the fascist pedophile over "woman who laughs weird" (something the GOP actually tried to use against her during their campaign).
she was also an american imperialist she made that clear.
If you've got any proof of that claim, lay it out for us. As someone who does not pledge allegiance to any politician in any way, shape, or form whatsoever, I would be very interested to see what you've got.
Yes, the fascist orange Nazi pedophile with dementia was a much better choice.
Pretty hilarious to sell something like this when hShop exists. Nintendo shut down services for the DS family a couple years ago, so others created a third party "shop" with the entire library of DS/3DS software available to download entirely for free.
Chances are they were taught but never kept up on it because clocks all over these days are digital.
but why are our news outlets amplifying their messages. They shouldn’t be
Because "our" "news" outlets are owned by the same people who funded the opposition to Mamdani in the first place.
That's what fascists do. Take terms that are commonly understood to mean something serious and use it against every person/group they don't like until it loses all meaning. Then when the fascists are inevitably found to be acting exactly like that term originally described, they can discredit whoever is accusing them because "everyone uses that word for everything, you just don't like us" despite being the cause of that problem in the first place.
And here come the "bUt wHaT aBoUt [insert specific situation not remotely related to the issue at hand]????????"
Nuance, guys. We all know there are certain specific situations that necessitate a photo in the restroom. Those situations are not at all relevant here.
They walked it back for now. It's gonna come back. They've already shown they were willing to cross the line, and they will do it again.
That's what you got from this?