lath

Starvation probably.

The original wheat wasn't used for food, but as a household item.
Gather it, beat it, wash it, beat it again, pleat it and you get some tutorial grass armour in your sandbox survival game.
Mix it with dirt, dry it, then stack it together and you have the tutorial shabby dirt brick house. Can even use it as a grass roof.

Anyway, you have some leftovers, the kids take it and play house. The crushed grains mixed with water turn to paste, let it near the fire. Holy shit, that baked bread scent starts wafting over and you haven't eaten in days! You take a bite and it's fucking delicious!

New food recipe unlocked!

So yeah, I made all that up, but sounds plausible no?

I'm on the phone, so not sure about desktop. In Settings, there's General and your account(s). In your account, right under Smart features there should be a Google Workplace Smart features and a Package Tracking below that.

Just look at that lovely lady breathing in nature, almost tasting it. She's so in tune with her surroundings, one could even say.. her ass is grass.

Awww! Invading other countries for oil is okay when it's gay!

The American Department of War - an LGB ally near you! Not for TQ+ though! We murder those in cold blood! Ha ha hah. wink

If that ain't proof microtransactions are a bane on society, then we're already too corrupt to care.

Fool. Just say the previous one was Bruce Wayne, you're Batman.

No, it's an always online single player MMO. Weird, but yeah.

It's actually named the "Mandalore effect", after the bounty hunter who'll shoot you with a blaster if you don't follow the Way.

I think it's more to do with its ongoing clash against Tencent. If they allow this to keep going, it may damage their chances on that side as well.

Shouldn't consider it completely unrelated. The comic's last panel says "I will not indulge in your poorly disguised fetish." That's a sex thing. So the comic opens that domain of discussion by making use of it. Nudes are another fetish, so bringing them up in the already approached avenue is theoretically within the general context.

Also, no offense, but when discussing someone's creations, unavoidably the person themselves also becomes a topic of discussion. Their past actions are brought up, in relation to the topic at hand or not. It is something we all do, whether we realize it or not.

Is it misogynistic? I'd say it borders on it as well. However, can we be sure this wouldn't have played out the same had said nudes were of a man instead of a woman?

But I think in this case, the user themselves and their history are what triggered a permanent ban instead of a lower punishment, which in my view shows that the comment itself wasn't really out of context after all.

Bosnians, probably.

KraftonAI.