lambalicious

Not a bad idea. I'll try to crosspost that news a few times later during the weekend to help build the bad behaviour portfolio.

.at_unchecked()

What kind of barbarism is that?

Doing that kind of split would kill genericity (more than it already is). If I'm using [] is because what I want is, more or less, to just access the value; not to maybe randomly and without any kind of source-level control or projected time/space boundaries go to the blockchain to check if the Rust devs are in the mood today to have blessed the given statement with the arguments given.

Frick. At least give me something like [checked(5)] or [unchecked(5)] for a more natural syntax. The more considering it has been possible to add compile-time checked access with something like [integral_constant<size_t,5>{}] since at least C++03! It just needs someone to propose a standardized notation shortcut. Or if there was some way to inquire or static_assert that the checks on the natural syntax are actually elided if I'm doing them myself elsewhere. But at it stands, uglifying the syntax is the worst of all worlds.

Well, you'll need dopamine and serotonin for all the new product spam mails you can get!

Shout out to [email protected] !

I think it’s pretty much guaranteed that they’re not going to take the sensible route of making it opt-out,

Because that's not the sensible route in the future, whether we like it or not. Hardened STL is being announced in the papers as "we are going to start with these silly one-line fixes that in theory should perturb no one, but as we iterate over this we're gonna start breaking things", which is not what you want to hear from the default.

One good example: placing enforced bounds check into the operator[] of std::array<> of all places. People keep telling me that I should be using std::array instead of normal C arrays, but then punish me for using std::array? That ends up making people revert to the True Old Ways That Work (aka: C arrays).

How cute that you believe that.

imagine someone comes over to your place and starts protesting and saying how bad you are

What, you want them to lie to you to your face?

¿Puede compartir el dato? Como para ver los specs igual, necesito notebook nuevo, y harto mejor si es un AMD...

This should like… just not be a rule though

Eh it's issues with l.w mods being overall cowards.

but isn’t one of the job of the police supposed to actually check people’s ID?

Define "people's", because not doing so is how we get into a police state and that was some Germany shit. Everyone? A subset at random? A subset at convenience? A subset based on how brown they look?

Think of the lemmy.world mods!!!!

Planet Zebebebebebebebebebebe