You can consider yourself whatever you want for however long you want.
If you feel young and people thing you are weird for saying so that is their problem. Young is a feeling not a number.
You can consider yourself whatever you want for however long you want.
If you feel young and people thing you are weird for saying so that is their problem. Young is a feeling not a number.
It's definitely an option. It will do the things that you want (as long as your phone is online, but that is the same for any other solution).
sending Signal messages with it would be less secure
Yes, this is because Beeper converts the Signal protocol to the Matrix protocol and vice versa. In order to do this it needs to access the messages. So it needs to decrypt the messages, then re-encrypt them on the other side. This means that the bridge (in this case operated by Beeper) has access to your messages. This is often referred to as "end-to-bridge" encryption, as it isn't end-to-end anymore.
This is going to be true of any bridge you use that is hosted by a third party. You are always adding one additional trusted party into your communication.
the recommended bridge instructions sends me over to Beeper, since I don’t have my own server
Yes, to practically operate a bridge you need your own Matrix server. This is because the bridge will create a new Matrix user for every remote participant (every phone number you communicate with in this case). Doing this with regular mechanisms would be difficult (as signup is likely restricted in some ways) and inefficient (as each account would need to be checked for new messages separately). Beeper runs their own homeserver so that they can operate their bridges. However Beeper's bridges are only available to users on the same homeserver (this is not a protocol limitation, just their choice). So in order to use their bridges you need to make an account with them (which you can, it is free IIUC). Beeper also offers custom clients which have special features for interacting with their bridges (for example making it easier to start a conversation with a new phone number).
The alternative would be to run your own server and bridge (or hire someone to it on your behalf).
This was intentional. The goal was to discourage the adoption of non-free codecs. They were partially successful, now AV1 is very widely supported (basically only older iThings that don't have hardware decoding support don't support it) which is a huge win because anyone can now deliver video on the web without needing a license to a proprietary codec. I would consider this fact alone a huge benefit and worth them holding other browsers asses to the flame.
Firefox on iPhone isn't Firefox in the way that matters here. All iOS browsers are forced to use Safari's rendering engine. iOS alternate browsers are just different UI and things like bookmark management on top of Safari.
IDK, how are we counting? Digestible calories? I don't think you are getting much energy from any amount of swords that you can fit in your stomach.
To be fair in this case I don't think we have much right to make fun of them until tolls get placed on the DVP.
The government is too big, why are we paying for healthcare, school, welfare and whatever else? It is unfair to those who don't use those services.
...oh, except roads and the military, everyone must pay for those.
It's amazing how many of these policies are posed as a simple fair rule (people should pay for what they want, not have the government decide where spending goes) but in actuality is just a convenient excuse for dismantling institutions that they personally don't like.
Yeah, this is basically how it goes. It depends what country you grew up in. Canada is the same way, almost everyone who grew up in Canada can swim (not necessarily well, but able to manage). This is partly due to the number of lakes that exist near populated areas so swimming is a common passtime and boating accidents are a fairly high cause of accidental death. There are some countries where it is much more rare.
I've been using nginx forever. It works, I can do almost everything I want, even if more complex things sometimes require some contortions. I'm not sure I would pick it again if starting from scratch, but I have no problems that are worth switching for.
IIUC it isn't censored per se. Not like the web service that will retract a "bad" response. But the training data is heavily biased. And there may be some explicit training towards refusing answers to those questions.
You can sue anyone in Canada as well. That doesn't mean you will win, or that the judge won't throw out your case before it starts.
For
.config
it isn't as important to me, but putting things that can be re-created in.cache
(well the proper environment variable that defaults to.cache
) is very nice because I don't need to back up all of that junk.But it wouldn't be unreasonable to put something like
.config
in a git repo, and storing full history for large and frequently changing files is a waste of space if they aren't really "config".