kersplomp

joined 1 month ago
[–] kersplomp@piefed.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

PSA: Don’t buy a gaming laptop. They are trash. The plastic case will melt, the wifi card will come loose, the battery will die within minutes. A steam deck is truly your best option.

And never ever buy alienware. Screw them in particular.

There’s a couple differences. It’s giving it the current time as part of the prompt, which is interesting. The other difference is that it’s asking it to make it responsive. But even when I use that exact prompt (inserting the time obv), it works fine on claude, openai, and gemini.

So there’s definitely an issue specific to this page somewhere. Maybe it’s not iframing them? I’m on mobile so I can’t check.

[–] kersplomp@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Really cool idea, but the site seems a bit biased for the chinese models, or is otherwise set up weird. I’m not able to reproduce how consistently bad the others are in web dev arena, which generally accepted as the gold standard for testing AI web dev ability.

[–] kersplomp@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

that’s a massive oversimplification

[–] kersplomp@piefed.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 week ago

What a condescending non apology

[–] kersplomp@piefed.blahaj.zone -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorry who are you? Why does suddenly everyone on the internet want to get a word in edge-wise as soon as I say something even mildly feminist? Literally none of my other comments get this much hate, but when I suggest that a person doesn’t have an innate right to someone’s nudes tons of random people from all over the internet have to show up in my inbox with their take. Ffs guys it’s a bad look

[–] kersplomp@piefed.blahaj.zone -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Actually yes, many prostitutes will film themselves doing the act, because it makes it technically legal in some states in the US if it’s “porn”. But you didn’t know that, so that’s besides the point.

Taking a step back: this is c/declineintocensorship not c/piracy. The fact that these are copyrighted means these pictures had even more protections than if not, legally speaking. Even ignoring the sensitive nature of these pictures, it is reasonable for the owner of content (the actresses and or producers) to enforce their copyright protections on these.

[–] kersplomp@piefed.blahaj.zone -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

However, it is a patronizing stance to blatantly state the actor’s sexual consent was violated, as it further objectifies the actor as little more than an (implied defenseless) woman being victimized.

The women said they didn’t know. And that is next level mental gymnastics to claim that I’m the one objectifying, and not the people literally reducing them to objects by sharing their nudes like trading cards against their wishes

[–] kersplomp@piefed.blahaj.zone -4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wild take. So in your mind prostitutes have no right to consent?

view more: next ›