"We've had a lot of problems with the French ..."
Oh no, watch out. Another freedom-fries-tantrum incoming.
"We've had a lot of problems with the French ..."
Oh no, watch out. Another freedom-fries-tantrum incoming.
*Concepts of a plan
That's just what they want you to think. /s
Otherwise the rectum would absorb the copious amount of drugs.
They need to ditch the veto, promptly. Then it might still have a chance of working.
But of course that won't happen because of veto.
I think they're relative line numbers (a setting in vim). So they count down to where the cursor is currently at. (and would count upward form there)
So you agree with the rest of my statement then?
That's not at all the same logic. Yes, cars can go way above speed limits. And there are use cases where cars need to have more power (driving uphill for example). But this is about an autopilot specifically programmed/instructed to actually go above speed limits, and going above speed limits is illegal. So the setting in itself is illegal. Having the technical ability to go above speed limits is not. If the driver chooses to use that ability and go above speed limits, it's illegal again. This is not rocket science.
Henley & Partners. Who - in a totally unrelated matter of course - netted almost 56 million euros off of scummy people like Russian oligarchs by helping them get Maltese 'Golden passports', a program ruled illegal by the European Court of Justice in part due to leaked documents from Henley & Partners itself.
And that's only the gap after (Verstappen) failing to get to the checkered flag in time for a second run.
It's the (expected fastest) point on track where they measure the top speed with a radar.
Damn, this 'Abu' guy came out of left field to nab the championship.