It doesn't matter what carney was the president off. You said that Brookfield would be the owner of these houses, and based of the evidence we have and you provided, there is zero proof that that's the case.
There is nothing else really to discuss. You made something up and stared it as fact, and you acknowledge that it's at best a guess based off weak connections.
I thought they were meant to be sold off to the private sector for short term gain
Where did you read that?
I played this a bunch back when it launched. I did enjoy it a fair bit.
This didn't work in Canada. That is the carbon pricing system we have and still the opposing party has made it so unpopular every party has said they will remove the system in the next election.
Despite lots of evidence that the carbon pricing system we have was a net positive for most Canadians, people still are convinced it's the cause of inflation.
What is considered an unnecessary expansion? Is this just when they add more variety of classes or start teaching new programs that there weren't enough people to support before?
Oh Absolutely, it's going to be a rough few years I worry.
I only brought it up because the economy is complicated, and most consumers don't understand what causes prices to increase, when then leads them to vote against their own interests.
I figure he best I can do is try to educate people where I can.
The list of items Canada is adding a tarrifs to has also been released https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-retaliatory-tariffs-united-states-trump-1.7448559
I only asked my question because the original commentor was suggesting that US prices were going to go up because Canada was adding export tarrifs.
I assume that because they deleted their comment they realized that wasn't true.
Are the egg prices being high caused by inflation? I thought it was the bird flu outbreak that the USA has been struggling to control over the last 3 or 4 years.
Which products is Canada putting an export tarrif on? This is news to me.
When did lies become hyperbole?
You said something untrue and then tried to continue to justify it as if it were true. If you were indeed trying to make a joke by exaggerating that should have been your initial response to my question, but instead you run into it.
You don't have to dumb anything down, if anything you need to step it up a notch if you're trying to pass off lies as truth ๐
Edit: if you're curious, what you did isn't hyperbole at all. Hyperbole would be suggesting that Brookfield will own all the rental properties, or something along those lines.
Trying to state that the government is planning to work with Brookfield to do this program isn't hyperbole unless there is a grain of truth to exaggerate, which there isn't. You can't exaggerate a lie and turn it into hyperbole.