jesterraiin

1. Are you AI/bot?
2. Wall of text = incomprehensible, would not read/5.
3. It's rarely about how good the devices are, but how much they cost + Apple's two-faced moral model that makes people oppose/reject it.

Would that be all?

Would that be all?

Yes, yes, of course.

Now, would that be all?

Keep it to the single branch of discussion, since you don't have much to say anyway, please.

I see

What I don't see is any proof that your ideas arn't anything but pro-pedophila propaganda that is meant to be "someone else's problem".

But, of course, you won't ever deliver any kind of proof that it's not.

So, would that be all?

What responsibilities?

Classic.

Same old repertoire of a coward faced with "proof yourself right" dillema.

Anyway.

Would that be all?

"This is the end of discussion!"

Right. Self-importance, helluiva drug, am I right?

We are in an anonymous text thread

...but it didn't prevent you from using "everyone who may read it will think you idiot" argument.

You're not thinking straight.

Would that be all, or are you going to continue, still trying to avoid your responsibilites?

"It's over... B-bbut not really! I don't care about any further discussion and let me tell you in length just how much I don't care!"

Predictable. The likes of you are all talk. You can't get enough of your own words, you feel euphoric about re-reading your comments (and whole discussion while at that) at least a few times.

But that's just talk, no walk. And as such it deserves no attention.

Would that be all?

I see you’re a broken record now,

Yes. There's no merit in a discussion where one side pushes possibly troubling, hurtful propaganda and ideals, while not being ready to actually back them up with actions, thus setting an example that it can be done, that it's not that bad. Much like every dictator ever demands for others to make it happen.

You’re wrong.

Feel free to prove it in real word, Internet dictator.

That will be all.

It was over long ago.

If you were honest about your philosophy, you'd seek some way to prove it - and yourself - to be solid, logical and, well, honest.

But you're not. You're looking for explanations, excuses, ways to divert the discussion, distractions, and finally insults. Like an undereducated AIs guided by inflexible software.

There's no way in hell that you're going to ever take the responsibility for your choices and suggestions. Because all you have in store is a bunch of idiotic ideas that are supposed to be "other poeople's burden.

Would that be all?

I did read yours. What makes you think otherwise?

The fact that you constantly avoid the challenge of proving your convictions true and correct.

The other explanation is that you're simply scared of it, or trolling, but I preferred to think you were simply too preoccupied with writing yet another comment. I don't anymore.

I wouldn’t need to prove shit

Uh-huh. You absolutely has to do, since "burden of proof..." and all that.

But you won't. Because you realize how weak, irresponsible and "let this be other people's problem" your train of logic is.

Fgures.