hardful9856

joined 9 months ago
[–] hardful9856@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Thanks for the detailed explanation and suggestion!

[–] hardful9856@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Yes that would be an alternative. But I’m looking for a more user friendly client that could achieve the goal.

[–] hardful9856@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

I just checked, they do send user agent to lemmy server.

For example

    final appVersion = getCurrentVersion(removeInternalBuildNumber: true, trimV: true);
    return {
      'User-Agent': 'Thunder/$appVersion',
      'Content-Type': 'application/json',
      'Accept': 'application/json',
      if (account.jwt != null) 'Authorization': 'Bearer ${account.jwt}',
[–] hardful9856@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

@tal@lemmy.today That post is somehow deleted by the mod so I could only reply here

I’m not personally familiar with Synology’s products, but if what’s going on is that you’re using some built-in feature of a Synology NAS to copy files from a USB drive to the NAS and seeing an error, I’d probably try copying that particular file to somewhere else on a PC, cutting the NAS out of the loop, to make sure that you don’t have, say, a corrupt filesystem where attempts to read the file contents are failing.

USB Copy is a built in application in synology. I set it up to do mirroring backup of several folders each day. Copy files to a PC works for me but not a long term solution

[–] hardful9856@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bots can easily fake their user agents, so using them to detect bots is not enough and mostly just puts regular users’ privacy at risk.

[–] hardful9856@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yes that would be an alternative. But I'm looking for a more user friendly client that could achieve the goal.

To be honest, this is a very specific method, and I don’t know which problem we’re facing. So this might as well be some A-B problem. So what are you trying to achieve?

user agent is not essential for the servers, server does not need to know which client or device I am using. So I don't want any server to fingerprint users.

[–] hardful9856@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Could you explain the use case?

user agent is not essential for the servers, server does not need to know which client or device I am using.

Now that AIs are flooding the instances, some admins are blocking these kinds of requests.

What AI request?

[–] hardful9856@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What do you mean by “device or client details”?

It means information like device type and which client I am using (voyager ...)

[–] hardful9856@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

Voyager app is indeed a Fediverse client. Thanks for your suggestion. Sadly TrackerControl does not block user agent sent to fediverse server.

[–] hardful9856@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Thanks this is very helpful

[–] hardful9856@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

Thanks this is very helpful

view more: ‹ prev next ›