this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
50 points (96.3% liked)

Selfhosted

61236 readers
176 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://kb.synology.com/en-global/DSM/tutorial/Docker_container_cant_access_the_folder_or_file#x_anchor_idcd3f1170a3

Why allow "everyone" to have read write permission to shared folders in order to run container manager? Wouldn't this be insecure?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Its not as egregious as you think. 'Everyone' group means every Synology user account - not that everyone on the network that can talk to the NAS, they'd still need both a Synology account and Shared folder permissions. Any Synology user trying to access those files would still have to have read and write access to the Share to actually access it (eg via file explorer SMB/CIFs or app-level access to Synology File Manager, or they would need to be granted SSH access to get in via terminal, etc) in order to R/w/m the files.

I know it's a bit confusing, but it's correct. Docker often causes confusion with file permissions. There are file-level permissions (this article) and there are share-level permissions. You need both to access folders and files via mapped drives / SMB, this setting is just to ensure that Docker containers which can be running as a variety of user names (depending on how you config docker and the container) don't experience issues accessing files you're expecting them to be able to access, as Synology says, the default Docker folder permission is for the 'everyone' group to have Read-only access. This should allow most Docker containers configs to at least run and then if you run into issues writing/modifying files.. That's a clue you have missed some file permission configuration settings that need to be done, and the only reason it's running at all is because that default 'everyone' permission is saving your butt.

[โ€“] hardful9856@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

Thanks this is very helpful

load more comments (3 replies)