golgorath

joined 3 years ago
[–] golgorath@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It could be defined that way. But your set is in a way more difficult to resolve as it has only one element. In the diagram the number of elements (4 sets) of the set is equal to the number 4 i.e. a set defines a number by simply counting its elements.

There are probably some other nice properties if you define it that way.

[–] golgorath@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Humanity may have enough of it but it is not distributed evenly.

[–] golgorath@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why would you cut it into pieces. Just burn it i'd say...

[–] golgorath@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

How about something like this?