He made a case against elitist/purist versions of leftism, so you accusing him of excluding people that aren't ideologically pure enough indicates that you massively missed the point.
Similar with “left-bashing”: he's a leftist, why would he? He has views about what makes us unable to be attractive to a wider audience, that's constructive criticism.
Did you watch a different video? He said that reality-challenged tankie spaces aren't able to contribute to a leftist movement that is able to attract workers.
That sounds entirely accurate to me.
I get it, giving the government the ability to randomly shift the boundaries of what's considered a hate symbol can backfire if the government becomes fashy. We can see that in the US right now where they twist everything they can to make things happen that they want to happen, with no regard for process and how tools were supposed to be used.
But that's historically not what happened with paragraph 86a, and I don't see it happening without AfD coming into power. I might eat my words some day, but precedent has held strong with that one.
No, criticizing Israel is certainly 100% not illegal, what are you talking about. Being pro-Palestine isn't illegal.
The only thing that's even tangentially related and therefore might have been what you heard and misinterpreted is that Hamas flags have been added to the list of anti-constitutional banned symbols in Germany, so those are illegal. But clearly support for Hamas ≠ “criticizing Israel” lol
if someone cosplays as a Nazi or thinks Hitler didn't murder 6 million […] then arresting them because of thought crimes is fascist behavior.
Hahahahaha no. It's not “thought crimes” when you explicitly say through symbols: “I want Jews, disabled people, leftists, and traveling folk to be genozided”. Because that's what that is. It's not a thought when you wear it or carry it around.
The US “free speech absolutist” Musk and his hypocritical friends have gotten into your mind. Preventing intolerance isn't intolerance in itself.
For something to be “criminalized”, it needs to be criminal. Antisemitism isn't a crime in Germany, so branding something as such might be propaganda but has no legal consequences.
Only when there's no professional playing a role. A self-help group with professional oversight is great.
Are you talking about Germany's ban on fascist symbols and Holocaust denial?
If so, calling that “fascist behavior” is the dumbest shit I've heard in a while. Seriously below “what happened to the tolerant left” level.
Mostly an internal threat. Internationally, as the article said, people are just reducing dependencies on the US to reduced potential damage if trump decides to try bullying.
That doesn't make sense. Nobody fears them here in Europe.
As the article said, this just led to European leaders intensifying the decoupling from dependencies onto the US, which makes its current bully administration less powerful and less able to hurt Europe.
Every village had a village idiot, now they network.
Same here in Germany, but these two parties are not at all the same, even if they don't differ much in that one (and a bunch of other) issues.
For anyone who is interested in knowing if she ever ended up shooting a fascist, here's the relevant paragraph from Wikipedia: