exocortex

joined 2 years ago
[–] exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I just want to have the vscode theme "Abyss" - but WITH the Types underlined! I hope that works with the builder.

[–] exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 months ago

Because it's washed?

[–] exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Took me a minute to understand what I am looking at. My brain said "the boats were derailed" and that was a little too strange to be possible.

[–] exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nice to see Frank Howarth there. Those video are pure relaxation. Setting YouTube to Wellness-Mode even. And technology connections of course.

[–] exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de 89 points 3 months ago (22 children)

I find that so crazy. I'm German and for us Italy is always the sunny south where it gets much too hot for us. The USA iseems more like us climate-wise. I'd always thought New York would be a little like Berlin. Crazy to see how far south most of the US actually is.

[–] exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago

I hate that every known company has to suddenly exploit their "brand recognition" and expand into unrelated areas. It's completely logical from a short-term-profits-from-uninterested-in-anything-besides-profits shareholders but destroys the value people ascribe to a certain brand in the long run. My favourite example: Marshall. They've been known for loud and DISTORTED guitar amplifiers for decades. They shaped the sound of so many famous bands. Their amps would last a lifetime and sound great! So someone thought "Hey let's make shitty headphones and Bluetooth speakers that will - by nature - not be durable, will have to excell in an area that Marshall never was interested in: amplifiers that do not distort the source material and that sound neutral. They had to rely on completely new technology like Bluetooth (which changes it's standard over time) or be dependent on shitty Internet companies like Spotify (who decide suddenly to brick devices by not supporting them anymore). It's almost the complete opposite of everything Marshall stood for IMHO. The only thing they have in common is that they make sound. The effect is that people buy products that break, decay or deteriorate on timescales much much shorter than the original brand would be expected. The thing that Marshal will be known for in the future is these speakers or breaking headphones with OK-sound quality. But a few management people will have made a lot of money of course.

[–] exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Thanks! Yeah I prefer the gnome one. I think it's heavier resource-wise but for people expecting an OS to look "like an OS" (people who prefer not to use a terminal) it's great. I think I've used KDE Like 10 years ago but I am not sure if it was KDE.

[–] exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Just a question: why fedora KDE? I've used fedora for a few years but always with gnome. Really liked it. What would be the advantage with KDE? Or what actually is the difference ?

[–] exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Es gab jede Menge Unterteilungen. Die relativen Unterschiede waren halt deutlich größer. Von 200g konnten die Hersteller halt nur auf 150g oder so runtergehen. Das fällt halt sofort auf. Wenn die von 200 auf 195, dann 187, 183, usw stück für stück runter gehen blickt es halt niemand mehr.

Ich weiß noch genau, wie das damals verkauft wurde - wie immer: "Mehr Auswahl für die Verbraucher". Wir waren damals ja alle total unglücklich unter diesem Diktat der wenigen packungsgrößenauswahl. Immer die gleiche Lobbyscheisse .

[–] exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 6 months ago

25 years ago Dave Barry wrote about "smart appliences" and said everything there is to say. His foresight was impressive - and extremely funny, like all his columns.

https://www.deseret.com/2005/9/18/19912434/smart-appliances-are-a-bad-buy-for-half-wits/

[–] exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It also has the coolest abreviation/name out of most image formats.

.jxl sounds a lot nicer than web-pee or avif.

Also Junkie XL made that famous remix of Elvis' "A Little Less Conversation" which is a banger.

[–] exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago

Thank you! Nice to know I'm not crazy :-)

4
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de to c/unixporn@lemmy.ml
 

First of all: Please don't tell me how impractically this might be or confusing or whatever. This is like a thought experiment and let's be honest: We don't JUST want efficiency when modding our desktops -- we also want it to look sick and individual and have people watch in admiration -- or something like that. So keep that in mind before dismissing rightaway :-) thanks!

  • I recently thought about a concept of tiling window managers. I don't know If this already works out of the box in some window managers. It was originally how I understood the concept of "tiling window managers" before I really got to know how they worked.

My general idea: Everything is just tiles on a larger canvas - with some exceptions everything visible can be laid out as a position on the screen. Also widgets are just tiles placed next to each other. There can (imho should) exist some rules for easy sizing of tiles / widgets, but that's details. I sometimes have the problem of working with one main application, but having to look up two other things A) and B) one after the other. I would switch between two screens all the time, but more ideally I would only move my screen slightly to get a look on either A) or B) while in both situations still having my main application in view. Moving between apps can be done simply with arrow keys (e.g. super + arrows) or mouse. There's also quickjump-positions. For example pressing 1 2 3 4 etc would move the screen to a previous set position (and could also preset the focused application)

Similar to a smartphone the background can move along in a more subtle way.

The login screen would just be a different place on that canvas - for security the rest outside the view has to disappear even when invisible while logged out (to avoid weird security issues :D

possible exception: An exception to "everything is in the canvas" could be when maximizing a focused application: Then the actual application is moving in front of the view (while the rest of the canvas is getting slightly further away). Some nice blurring could make that really nice. If the application tile isn't in the screen's aspect ration before it will change its aspect ration in the same motion while moving.

So in short: Instead of having tiles fixed to screens why not have tiles everywhere and move the screen step by step.

A lot of hotkeys need to be thought about here of course. Also specialized behavior to resize tiles. Increasing the width/height or changing the aspect ratio would require moving surrounding tiles around in certain situations, but these shouldn't bee too complicated. Again: some rules about minimum/maximum values for width/height/desired aspect rations could help.

Even the angle of viewing could be changed in some situations not in situations where switching often is required. But I'd love me some nice rotation and translation when locking my screen :-)

What do you think?

( I might cross post this to reddit's unixporn subreddit later as well)

view more: next ›