Yeah, fair, the NASA article is better. I'm not mad about it, though; I'd rather talk about the JWST, cosmology, and the Hubble tension than more political shit.
elephantium
joined 2 years ago
I think you're understating things. The measurements don't have to be 100 km/s/Mpc apart to cause problems for our understanding of the universe. Ruling out measurement error means we have to go back to the drawing board on cosmology. The problem isn't sloppy telescopes or anything -- it's definitely a hole in our current model.
To be fair, there’s always been something deeply wrong with ~~how~~ most people ~~understand the universe~~.
FTFTFY :P
...Is it unclear that "James Webb" in this context refers to the telescope by the same name? Or are you just shitposting?
Glory...to your memes
I was actually thinking of this one (apparently from 2020):
Glory to you and your cat tree!
I like the use of Harding and Kerrigan here. Reminds me of the Undertaker meme.
Your comment made me think of DJs. Not "real" musicians? Seems like a similarly-structuree argument.
view more: next ›
:-D