dudeami0

Citizens united, not the first step but the last step in the downfall of democracy in the United States. It's what empowered Elon Musk to dump money into swaying the election, as his wealth according to the supreme court is "free speech". Pathetic.

Centralization is a weakness. These services can be targeted by governments that want to limit communication. Free speech is a commodity, and servers host this free speech. If a hostile organization, such as a government, targets a channel of free speech such as those hosted on a platform that makes it easy to setup a mastodon instance, this become an easy target that will affect a large portion of users. If you are serious about freedom, you have the freedom to self-host your own platforms.

Edit: I realize my post doesn't answer the question proposed, but it's more of an argument against such services. I would argue self-hosting doesn't rely on paying third-parties to host your software, but I guess this is in the eye of the hoster.

Hopefully we stop relying on these corporate journalist cause "journalism" is bought and sold at this point. Where are the independent journalist? I think we need to start looking towards a platform to fund people who seek the truth, cause every established modern outlet seems to be selling the same shit.

Surprise!

Then the menu is a broken webpage with "old" prices and the restaurant tries to charge you more than the menu prices. I thought the point of these were to be easily updated.

Our studies show this lower literacy-higher receptivity link is strongest for using AI tools in areas people associate with human traits, like providing emotional support or counselling.

This is really dangerous, as subjective matters can easily steer people in vulnerable positions to think and act a certain way. Depending on the training data and safe guards put in place, this could easily lead to AIs telling users to do horrible things to themselves or others.

If anything I think they'll keep the games price low, as to get people into online and spend the money there. GTA Online has been a huge cash cow for Rockstar, and I don't have exact numbers but based on this article I would say most of the profit comes from online play. I would guess they'll go with the $60-90-120 model or something similar for different versions, probably with some bonus content for online included with the "ultimate" editions. Only Rockstar and maybe some kid who is hacking them knows for sure though.

When I say residential IP addresses, I mostly mean proxies using residential IPs, which allow scrappers to mask themselves as organic traffic.

Edit: Your point stands on there are a lot of services without these protections in place, but a lot of services are protective against scrapping.

I don't think either are good, but it's funny how it's bad when the other guy is doing it.

As a hobbyist programmer/game developer, ya basically hit the "as a programmer" part on the nose as in it's why I care. In my opinion the issue is because we have faster and faster chips, we don't care as long as it runs which means it's using as much of the device as possible which means higher energy consumption. Also, DLSS has to be trained so you can lump it into how AI is causing more coal to be burned and water to be wasted cooling data centers designed to train AI.

Is it just me, or is it depressing that modern gaming has succumb to requiring AI gimmicks to run performant? Why does every new AAA title require DLSS and why would I want AI generating 75% (as I perceive the DLSS 4x, correct me if wrong) of the frames that induces artifacts like halos and blur anyway? What is it about these games that some optimization wouldn't be warranted for them to run without some AI layer on top to get 60 fps, let alone the 144+ fps that consumers now expect?

Foreign propaganda bad. Native propaganda good.

Edit: To add on this, isn't this capitalism? These people are being paid to do a job, shouldn't that be celebrated? /s