data1701d

joined 2 years ago
[–] data1701d@startrek.website 19 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Actually, I think Sam Eagle would be a better Worf; he has a more serious demeanor, and it’d be funny to watch him have to correct himself to say “the Klingon way.”

Of any main character in the whole franchise, Animal would probably make a better Shaxs, but we’re focused on TNG.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Star Trek: The Search for Ensign Peter

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago

I wouldn't touch with with an approximately 12 meter pole.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago

I'm very close to finishing my current TNG rewatch and am looking forward to throwing on Generations to commemorate the season.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think I have a bit more nuanced feelings on the MIT license. If I actually write something useful, GPL all the way, baby!

However, I don't necessarily think the MIT license is the embodiment of evil; I find GPL a bit overkill for hobby projects. I'm not talking things that have the potential to become critical pieces of infrastructure like a kernel or something; I'm more talking about emoji pickers or hacky little Python scripts that would be pretty useless to a Fortune 500. In the minute chance someone actually cares about my silly little toy to fork it, I see very little point in encumbering it with the full heft of a copyleft license and stopping them from doing whatever the heck they want.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I agree that DS9 probably wins by far on its ability to hold off fleets during the Klingon and Dominion Wars.

However, I’m not sure I would dismiss Voyager so fast as a contender against the Enterprise D - I think Voyager is both well-armed and comparatively agile, with a higher maximum warp speed and likely a higher cruising speed. I think the ship’s unique strengths would at least give the D a significant struggle.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago

"Move Along Home" is a masterpiece; it's the kind of bad episode that's really fun to watch.

Bashir screams with his eyes closed and his back against the wall at the TOS episode "The Alternative Factor", TNG episode "Code of Honor", pretty much any VOY episode focused on Chakotay, ENT episode "These are the Voyages", and LD episode "a mathematically perfect redemption." He then smiled weirdly at TOS "Spock's Brain", TAS "The Magicks of Megas-Tu", TNG "The Game", DS9 "Move Along Home", VOY "Threshold", and ENT "A Night in Sickbay".

But yeh, I think it's really stupid to dismiss a show based on its first season.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I just dont like any of the characters

Not even Saru? 😢

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, SNW only gets a 10 episode season, so based on ratio, 1 silly episode of SNW is equal to ~2.5 episodes of TNG; it doesn't take a lot of silly episodes to make it seem like a huge amount of silly in SNW.

I know we probably can't go back to 25 episode seasons because those were always very taxing to work on, but I think 15 episodes is a good compromise. I think SNW would have really benefited from a season of about that length; even 12 episodes would be nice.

Heck, as convoluted as Discovery could get, from what I watched of the show (up to a few episodes into S4), it somewhat benefited from a longer season in the sense we had plenty of time for multi-episode plots, which are harder to develop in a 10 episode season balancing episodic and linear storytelling. However, I don't think they used that time the most effectively, as season 3 often felt like death by subplots - the episode would take on so many subplots that, although each of them individually may have been good ideas, none of them ended up being particularly well-executed. It's especially weird because they didn't really need to do that; there was more than enough episodes to, say, have one subplot as an A plot and another as a B plot, then continue the B plot next episode as an A plot and have another B plot.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 3 points 6 months ago

Honestly, I think what we have yet to truly see in Star Trek is someone in Starfleet who saves the day but ultimately cannot be absolved of their wrongdoing and cannot avoid the consequences if they’re not going to take the necessary steps for redemption - doing one important thing does not give you the moral license to do whatever you want.

They got close in TNG:”Ethics”, but ultimately the only “discipline” Russell gets is getting yelled at by Dr. Crusher - no investigations or anything.

I’d almost want to have an allegory for how we should deal with sexual harassment in the sciences, basically showing the senior staff handling the situation correctly and doing what should have been done with creeps like Richard Feynman, and maybe examining the negative tropes of past Trek. Then again, TNG has so many clumsy sexual harassment episodes that I’m worried it’d be hard to do the issue justice.

Although I’ve never watched Black Mirror, from what I’ve heard of the episode, maybe USS Callister did better than Star Trek ever could on this matter.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

And this is how Alexander ended up joining a homicidal cult in the IDW comics... Very Beta canon, but also feels like a thing that would happen.

view more: ‹ prev next ›