daniskarma

Being an artist is nothing special. As I have been defending since forever, everyone and everything can be an artist. Even the wind and the rain can be artists in the sense that they can create art. What's difficult in this life is being a GOOD artist. That, very few are.

I'm not into identity politics, sorry. Can't say I'am surprised anti-AI people having an overlap with indentity-politics.

Holding a pencil over a piece of paper don't make you a master of graphite on canvas.

So no, you would not know. Same as you have show me a vast lack of knowledge in art-related themes.

Once again I must repeat that you don't even knew what the concept of generative art, as the conceptual art that started getting famous on the 1960s, is.

How are you even able to talk about these topics without such basic previous knowledge?

You have the right to have opinions, but you must admit that opinions from people who know are more valuable that opinions from people who does not know. I have argued here with people with very based and knowledge-funded opinions against AI art. I would recommend to read those to get an oposition to my points.

Same as you don't know what generative art is. You don't know how AI art is made.

And sorry but I don't have time right know to educate you, specially knowing that you will refuse to learn.

But, on the least, the refusal to accept knowledge saddens me. Dogma thinking is clearly winning our society.

And please, just please, don't give yourself vibes of "knowing the grasp of art" when you clearly don't know much about art. Once again you didn't know what generative art was, and you didn't even bother to make a quick search to find out. You just read generative and thought it was "AI" because you probably never cared about art at all. You are just against something that they have told you that you have to be against.

Typical, talking all that much about art and don't know shit about art.

Here, for your knowledge.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_art

Generative art exist since the XVIII century, much earlier than you have even been alive. And boomed with computer era in the 60s. And have never been specially controversial (not more controversial that any other contemporary art style at least).

And not, it's not AI art. It is a different art style that people that like to fill their mouths """defending"" art don't even know.

That's what you get for following the dogma without using your brain. Radical ignorance. People that "don't know and don't want to know" no wonder that political situation is how it is with so many people rejecting knowledge and just following religion or religion-like dogmas.

Same product ban on temu but allowed through any drop shipping local shop at thrice the price.

I am very proficient with the terminal. But there are many use cases when I want a OS that does not need the terminal at all. For instances media dedicated pcs.

I have a pc that I only use from the couch, for playing games a viewing media, and using the terminal from my remote size keyboard is a bore, I would prefer a 100% gui solution for that usage.

That seems a convoluted disticntion.

When I see these pieces in museums I've seen the piece not the algorithm. I should call the artists and museum curators and tell them they are doing it wrong.

I suppose with digital art the art is the brushes and the log of movements, not the final .png

The intent for the artists is to create the final images, the thing that the viewer enjoys is the final images. I think it's easy to asume than the final images are art. Even if you also want to consider the code itself a piece of art, that's totally ok.

So generative art is not art?

Generative art is an art style that existed for decades (some people even mark up the XVIII century as the birth of this style). In this art style the artist create an algorithm, and that algorithm will later produce diverse results (music or plastic arts) based on randomness so the final result is unknown and volatile.

This art is not made with traditional techniques, as an algorithm is used to produce the final piece. Nowadays this art is obviously computer generated.

And no, this kind of generative art does no uses or have anything to do with AI generative art. Completely different techniques.

Latin America. They are not aligned with NATO or Russia/China. And the level of life quality have greatly improved in later years. In fact many migrants feel cheated when coming here because they thought europe was better than it actually is in comparison.

My country used to be a fascist dictatorship and there's still plenty of people alive who were educated on false information and a different fabricated version of history.

Certainly missinformation is not anything new.

And people should prevent it and solve it the same way it has always be solved. Taking the missinformators out of power.

It's not a tech issue. It's a political issue.

I was a simpler kid. I just thought that the sun was going to just disappear and we wouldn't notice for 8 minutes.

I was literally looking at the sky thinking the sun has already be gone.