danielquinn

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ah, I must have read the Wikipedia page wrong. I thought it said "slim minority". Well it's good to hear the Greens aren't in bed with this!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What is the Green's position on this? The NDP are a minority government and the Greens have just enough seats to topple it, so I have to assume they don't think this would be worth it?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

Ah yes the tried-and-true defence against violent, expansionist fascists: nonviolence. /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago
  1. Go to https://retrodeck.net/
  2. Scroll down to the bottom and click on "Learn More" screenshot
  3. This takes you to: this dead page.
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Fascinating! Thanks for sharing. I'm not sure I'd be happy in a fully remote role where you've got hundreds of employees voting on how you build stuff, but I know that there are lots of people who dig this pattern, and they're clearly doing Good work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

True, but the mere existence of an AGPL project that follows the MIT one might be enough to convince would-be contributors to choose our version instead.

It may also be more likely to be adopted by non-corporate Linux distros that favour the AGPL over MIT (Debian for example) which in turn could help make the AGPL version the dominant one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Hoooooly shit. Yeah, fuck this guy.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The best example I could point to would be BSD. Unlike Linux, the BSD kernel was BSD (essentially MIT) -licensed. This allowed Apple to take their code and build OSX and a multi-billion dollar company on top of it, giving sweet fuck all back the community they stole from.

That's the moral argument: it enables thievery.

The technical argument is one of practicality. MIT-licensed projects often lead to proprietary projects (see: Apple, Android, Chrome, etc) that use up all the oxygen in an ecosystem and allow one company to dominate where once we had the latitude to use better alternatives.

  • Step 1 is replacing coreutils with uutils.
  • Step 2 is Canonical, Google, or someone else stealing uutils to build a proprietary "fuutils" that boasts better speeds, features, or interoperation with $PROPRIETARY_PRODUCT, or maybe even a new proprietary kernel.
  • Step 3 is where inevitably uutils is abandoned and coreutils hasn't been updated in 10 years. Welcome to 1978, we're back to using UNIX.

The GPL is the tool that got us here, and it makes these exploitative techbros furious that they can't just steal our shit for their personal profit. We gain nothing by helping them, but stand to lose a great deal.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Here's a fun idea, let's fork these MIT-based projects and licence them under the AGPL :-)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

My shit is custom and rather elaborate.

Screenshot of the prompt

From left-to-right:

  • name@server-name
  • Uptime (multiplied by 10 and rounded to the nearest integer to save space)
  • Percentage disk space available on /
  • Number on established network connections
  • Git branch : commit
  • Python virtualenv
  • [new line]
  • date and time

The code for this is on GitLab.

view more: ‹ prev next ›