I think a comedy is "less canon" because calling Cerritos a "California class" is more like saying "this is the most wimp or weakling starfleet ships ever". So I believe Lower Lecks is canon, but not everything can be taked into a 100% serious story. But that's just my thought.
cuchi
So, reading a bit yesterday and reading your comment now, historically aircraft carrier enterprise was class Nimitz because, well, they like the name, so I can give an idea how can work in Star Trek. I didn't know ships have "class" and random names, I always thought it was more logically choosen.
Sumarise: Now I know ships has random names and class with all similar ships, but class is not equal of ranks or something. Like hierarchy, that's why I didn't get it.
I don't get it.
I notice california class was a joke, that's why I ask how much is canon in general.
I look that Zhenzhou and is "Walker-class" what does class means? At least Crazy horse is from the original series, so maybe was a time of brainstorming.
I ask about target in another thread, I think Paramount dosen't know the Star Trek target either.
We need this artstyle again. /s

Looking it now, it reminds me of those Invincible memes people made up.
Star Trek Voyager but the writers are from Star Trek Lower Decks.
I don't know, DS9 is not that edgy and when there is extremist actions they are complained for not follow the starfleet tradition or being unethicals.
Yeah, something similar happend to somebody which watch the series with me.
Old Star Trek is really a series who you need to use your imagination to don't notice the lame special effects, that's something which was fixed in new Star Trek with high budget visual effects.
This reminds me to people who says bald men are evil, we are in mirror universe already?
So starfleet has quota law?
Is plausible to go faster of warp 10, but not reaching warp 11, so is nothing wrong to me.