cone_zombie

The amount of cope in this thread is astonishing. I never thought I'd see an actual person justifying killing hundreds of thousands of civilians with a straight face. But here we are

Yeah, I'm so glad the civilians in Hiroshima got punished for participating in war crimes

I'd go for enriched uranium. No need for a backlight

I don't think the TV was the only thing being "flicked" that evening.

The comic depicts destruction of means of production, hence my question. Would you consider a car "personal property"? What is your overall take on the whole tesla situation. It looks to me as if you support it to some degree

I think it's partially because of Smithers, who acts like his better half, kind of negating many of Burns's traits. It's also because he's intentionally written like this, akin to Grinch, someone who tries so hard to be evil that it's hard not to pity him

What do you achieve by destroying the "means of production"? And what is your stance on destroying regular people's property? Honest questions

You can't start drinking if you never stop

The joke is not about "eating", the AI just tried to guess the meaning but kinda failed. The joke is about two famous civil war figures in the USSR (Chapayev and Pet'ka), which often are subjects of crass jokes.

The first half is correct. Pet'ka asks Chapayev to explain the definition of "nuance", as it's a foreign word that he doesn't understand. Chapayev asks him to put his pants down and puts his dick in Pet'ka's ass. Pet'ka is perplexed.

Chapayev says: "See, we're both in a "dick in ass" situation. But there's a nuance."

And they still try to downplay it - "the worst since Assad"

"Why are you calling this facility a prison? Sure, you cannot leave, but at least you can ENTER!"

I'll just take 3 depressions, thanks