No it's not my assertion. I'm just offering an another way of looking at it. It's still possibly a pure conflict of interest. I guess with limited information you never know
baconmonsta
joined 3 months ago
My favourite performance of his was Toby Dammit. RIP
Just a hunch, but maybe most judges qualified to rule on an aviation case have at some point worked with some major carriers?
And I suppose you assume that cars will just float magically if you build a railroad?
I'm not sure if you've really thought this one through. Railway maintenance is expensive, and operating stations and switches requires personnel as well. In low-traffic areas you could get away with one single bus line, meaning you only need to maintain that one bus and pay the driver's salary.
I understood they let anyone charge only on paper, using higher fees as a barrier for non-teslas. I might be wrong though.
But it's really all about the charging infrastructure and the seamless technology of the car. No one comes even close."
Norway is big and sparsely populated. Having access to supercharging stations really makes several hours difference on your roadtrip if you exceed the car's range
Hmm that is alarming then. To be honest I didn't read the complete article, which you linked, but on first glance paints a very different picture.
Coal use isn’t cast as a sign of villainy, as it would be among some circles in the U.S. – it’s simply seen as outdated. This pragmatic framing, Fishman argued, allows policymakers to focus on efficiency and results rather than political battles.
There's truly something for western politicians to learn from this
What exactly does a "long" knock sound like?
On a positive note, they are probably not participating in the future gene pool