aski3252

>Same, but I’m leaning towards the idea that us having numbers alone isn’t enough in this situation if we don’t show why numbers matter. It’s why I’m critical of leaders. Our masses are upset, angry, reactive. We need leaders who can channel and guide the strength of numbers and turn it into something useful

That’s what I mean when I say we need organisation. Leaders sure, but an overreliance on leaders is dangerous too. What we mainly need is organisation and discipline.

>Losing faith in their leader is not the same as losing faith in the ideology.

I completely agree, but it’s a potential opening. As long as they still have faith, it’s virtually impossible to reach anyone. When they are losing faith, it provides an opportunity to spread that doubt to not just a leader, but to other aspects of their worldview. It won’t work with everyone, it takes time and won’t work over night and it maybe won’t work in very aspect, but it’s a start.

>Massie and MTG are perfect examples of this.

We have to make a big distinction between leaders/politicans/progapandists and voters. Leaders/politicians/propagandists always have a political and/or financial incentive to hold their line. They might change leaders if it is beneficial to them, they might even switch sides when it is beneficial for them, but one has to assume it's purely opportunistic.

With voters, it CAN be different. But again, getting people to change their ideology/philosophy/core worldview isn’t easy and doesn’t happen automatically, which is why the “Fuck them, it’s not my job to educate them, they have to change their mind by their own, else I won’t have any contact with them“ attitude is a big mistake in my view because that practically guarantees them voting.

>We should be accepting of whatever help we can get, even if it’s some an-cap that only sides with us 10% of the time.

I don’t even think we should just accept them in our rank or work with them necessarily, I’m saying we need to have some kind of exchange with them in order to oppose their view. I don’t think you disagree with me, but so many online leftists seem to have the opinion that we should simply ignore them or tell them to fuck of until they somehow become radical leftists by themselves. That’s pretty much my main point.

>Alligator Alcatraz and El Salvador are not Dachau or Auschwitz. I agree that we’re not at the level of industrialized genocide like the Nazis were, but we’re deeper than should be allowed.

While I do understand the Nazi Germany comparisons to some degree, I’m not sure how useful they are. Conentration Camps were not unique to Nazi Germany or invented by them. And while Trump and the Trump Regime has some things in common with Nazi Germany and fascism, there are important differences. After the nazis seized power, they had near absolute power very soon. Opposition parties and/or opposition groups were outlawed and members imprisoned on a large scale. Very soon, any effective resistence from within was virtually impossible.

That’s not the case in the US and Trump still has a long way to go until they get there. People’s rights and liberties are definitely under attack, but they do still exist in some form and that must be exploited as long as you still can. Trump has no absolute power, he cannot simply arrest every member of the DSA, etc. Again, there is definitely a tendency towards autocracy, but it’s not done in the same way as in Nazi Germany, so tactics are not the same.

My suggestion is that this is not a situation where voting in better candidates

I'm not talking about voting, I'm talking about building organised mass movements who eventually can excercise leverage to achieve goals.

Maybe I'm too old school, but I still believe that the only way to achieve the radical change is by organised mass movements.

And you can forget about that if you are not even willing to get into contact with people who are losing faith in their right wing leader, but who might not have abandoned all their right wing believes. That's the perfect time to engage and further challenge their views, otherwise nothing will change and they will fall for the next right winger.

I think the solution is doing what we did against this kind of bigotry in 1861 and 1941

It's not 1941, it's not even 1933 yet, although very close to it. And until then, you shouldn't have a working class civil war, but organize..

“Fuck ‘em” isn’t a dismissal of their beliefs, it’s a dismissal of their right to exist.

I'm not sure what your point is or rather I think I'm misunderstanding. Are you suggesting leftists should start to assasinate all trump voters? If yes, that's very silly and not something that will happen. And if it would happen, it would be devestating for the left and only benefit the right. Violence is their game, our game is numbers and leverage.

But yeah, I think we are talking past eachother.

basically all cardio machines at the gym are going to be boring as all hell, going outside and doing activities is a lot more fun

Or, alternatively, use the stationary nature of indoor machines to make it less boring. I typically read. Or maybe watch a show or movie.

Outside is great too of course, but bad weather can be hard to overcome depending on where you live.

Until that attitude changes, fuck ‘em.

What I don't understand is how you expect that attitude to change. Bigottry isn't some kind of inate human characteristic, it is a tool/weapon used to divide us and stop us from reaching our goals.

I get that it's nice to imagine people just snapping out of it an realizing all their mistakes, but in the vast majority of cases, this won't happen by sheer magic..

Bigotry is thaught by your environment. And environment won't change without great effort. The right is putting in great effort to change people's environment so they don't get exposed to ideas which are dangerous to them. What is your suggestion, to just let them and give up? You think leftists and organizers of the past did that?

When I say "you", I mean you Americans and online lefties in general, not you personally.. I'm not suggesting you pit yourself in danger, but the only chance of turning around and somehow saving us from global disaster is to build mass movements along class lines.

And I'm not saying bigotry isn't an issue, quite the opposite. But a prerequisite to combat bigottry and organising in general is contact and engagement, and we are so far away from even that. So many people are desperately searching for solution, and the only people giving them some kind of explanation is the right..

There is so much work to do and so little time, and frankly, having likeminded people talking about working class solidarity and rising up against the ruling class while doing jack shit except for ranting online and somehow expect change to happen by sheer magic is very demoralizing..

So if you don't feel you are up to it or feel like you are putting yourself in danger, it does not apply to you. But we as the global left cannot afford to dismiss everyone who might still have bigotted views. And moments of disillusion with their right wing idols are perfect opportunities to work on their bigotry.

It's the only thing combatibg bigotry, it always takes effort and time.

I 100% agree. And no, it shouldn't be our job. But unfortunately, it kinda is.

I mostly grew up in a right wing/conservative environment. The only reason why I'm not a right winger is because I always had a curiosity for different ideas and ways of thinking and wanted to actually understand people's views.

Eventually, as frustrating as it was, I had to come to terms that many people don't share that curiosity. Most people are focused on other things and only seem to kind of adopt concepts they are told, often without really thinking about it.

And more often than not, it's right wingers telling them stuff and it's right wing stuff that sticks, as right wing stuff is quite simple and easily digestable (simple concepts, clear enemy, simple problems and simple solutions). However, oftentimes, it does not stick very hard and the only reason why it sticks is because they are simply never challenged. In a lot of cases, it slowly falls apart if you challenge them, as long as you don't give them an easy excuse to dismiss you.

But unfortunately, this is typically not a fast process. So yeah, it is very frustrating, especially because people have access to all the knowledge they need.

But the hard reality is that chances are they will sooner go down a crazy right wing conspiracy rabit whole. In order for them to move towards the left just by themselves, they would need to throw their entire understanding of virtually everything they know out the window, and by that point, the right is more comfortable because you can just build your world however you want.

It's very likely that they don't learn what they aren't thaught. You don't teach anything if there is no contact, and moments like this are opportunities for contact.

Yesyes, I get it, it's not your job to teach them. The issue is though that nobody else will, except of course propagandists on the right who are happy to teach them.

It is kind of baffling to me that many don't seem to have an analysis/understanding of maga beyond "stupidity and racism".

Of course that's a big part, but by itself, it's only scratching the surface?

And you don't have sympathy for Trump voters turning cloak? Seriously? I hope you can at least pretend because you aren't getting out of this mess without working with people like that. Else you might as well give up now.

This is probably unpopular, but Taiwan is imo not a good example of imperialism. Taiwan is where the old government has fled to and where the government there officially still claims to be the rightful goverment of China. Their official name is republic of China, which obviously leads to tensions with the "people's republic of China".

Imperialism is when a nation excercises significant influence and control over other independent nations. Taiwan is not an independent nation, they are a rival/competitor with similar regional claims.

A better example of Chinese imperialism could be their economic initiatives in Africa.

They say Arthemis landed on EARTH, but it actually landed on WATER (no earth far and wide). If they lie about something so obvious, what else are they lying about??

Don't try to tell me that it's all so easy now, I literally just went through hours of research and experimenting and samba settings and changing my disk's fstab file just to get a folder to show up on my home network.

For most people, it is (and has been) that easy. If it works as intended, you can simply open your desktop explorer thing, click on network and have it show up. I know that because that has been my experience a couple of years ago and I was surprised at it just working so flawlessly. To be clear, I'm not denying your issues, I'm just pointing out that your experience is not automatically the average experience.

Of course there can be bugs and other issues which require troubleshooting, but that's not specifically a linux issue.

The difference is that for non-techies, it's harder to troubleshoot because advice you find is mostly written for techies, there is less info and there are a lot of different linux based operating systems.

For techies, it's generally easier to troubleshoot because you can get more info out of the system (if you know how) and you generally have more power over the system.

but pretending it's all smooth sailing and so easy and polished is misleading.

I agree, you cannot generalize a personal experience and then universally apply it to every person as well as every linux based distribution, like "it'll work flawlessly out of the box because that's been my experience". You also cannot generalize it over every linux based system. I have tried a lot of different distros with different hardware and my experience has varied a lot. I have had issues and bugs with ubuntu that just didn't happen with arch based distros.

But again, it's virtually never smooth sailing for everyone in every case. Windows users have to troubleshoot issues and bugs too.

In recent years, I started to feel differently. Sure, it's nice if you have 1 app/1 tool to do a lot of things, but it comes at the price of dependency. When a service/tool turns to shit (which seems to be a matter of time in most cases), it's so much harder to find something new.

So I tend to prefer a lot of different simple tools that can do one thing only, but they can do that one thing right. And if it turms to shit, I can just replace the single tool instead of having to find an alternative that can do everything.