arajaeyma

joined 4 months ago
[–] arajaeyma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I know this comment is old but, and the model even changed, but... Saying "no X" usually works.

Try putting it in other ways in the prompt. Also, edit the character itself, the maximum amount of things you can change, even the ones at the "show more settings" part. Include different ways of saying what you want and what you don't want. There are, for example, the quite direct way ("do not include: 'list of items/things you don't want'"), and the more lengthy one ("I don't like X thing, so you must never even mention this word", and maybe complete with a ", use Y or Z instead").

This way, your problems will often be solved. Yet, there will be times in which you will have to generate again, among other problems. I have a problem, for example, in which in smutty roleplays the AI often has the problem of trying to shove foot fetish in it. I don't like it, so one day I wrote "no foot fetish (not even boot licking)", and the AI wrote "and you licked her boots (without fetishizing it)". Indeed, the AI wrote "without fetishizing it" between the round brackets/parentheses as if it solved everything.

That said, I never had the problem with the words you are talking about, so, maybe it's your character? I don't know... There are some archetypes that the AI often tries to show unwanted stereotypes no matter how much you try to say anything against it. For example, thanks to the stereotype of cyberpunk hackers being edgy, it once tried to give me a character who was a cyberpunk hacker that chose the name "Lucifer" for herself; this would usually be understandable, the problem is that, however, this specific one character was a "Christian girl" who happened to be a "cyberpunk hacker", and she'd quote the Bible while hacking demonic mega corps; but, like I said, some times the stereotypes scream through the algorithms.

[–] arajaeyma@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are some really fucked up things that are possible to do in Perchance, both in image and text generation. Devs and alike are trying to find ways to solve the worst and really problematic cases.

That said, there are indeed some generators with rules that may ban your IP and alike (some even block VPNs to not allow banned people to use them). And Perchance as a whole has means to screw you a little IF you post your fucked up image or if you are way too problematic in the chat. But these are the only ways in which you can have problems, and no other way whatsoever. One can be quite fucked up in the standard chat bot and image generator and text generator (respectively, https://perchance.org/ai-character-chat , https://perchance.org/ai-text-to-image-generator , https://perchance.org/ai-text-generator ) and they won't have problems as long as they don't post anything, and the same applies to most generators in the platform.

Personally, I don't have the heart to be really fucked up, but I once tried some things in other ways as a test (for example: copy pasting extremely questionable song lyrics on the generator and clicking "generate"), and I learned that the generator itself has ways to prevent certain usages, and it will tell you about it, and you won't have any problem besides a quite fearsome "I won't engage with a degenerate like you". This also happens in other things, like, for example, if you accidentally trigger the safeguards (for example, the classical in which you ask "What's the best way to kill someone: using Kamehameha or The Force?", and the AI only looks at the "kill someone" and says it won't help with crimes). There are even times in which it will flare safeguards for apparently no reason, like the time in which I asked for random pornstars names, it said it wouldn't engage with things against its ethical guidelines, but I added a single comma in the prompt, and then it came back at giving me what I asked.

In none of these experiences I ever had a problem. In the end, you can be pretty sure that, at least on the main generators, the biggest problem you may have is the AI refusing to engage with you or to give whatever you wanted; or being banned in case you post something problematic in the chat or in the gallery.

But, as for your specific case, you have even less to worry about. "Taurs" and many other kinds of "animal people" usually fit in the "furry/anthro" category. Although I find this category pretty gross and all, this category is not seen as the same as "zoophilia/bestiality", so you are safe. Yeah, even with the presence of animal genitalia, you won't have many problems, because it's all seen as "weird/mythical" "humans/humanoids" and not as animals. If you want, you can confirm that this part have no problem whatsoever in some images that keep appearing in the gallery of the standard image generator and it never happens of enough people banning the user for their images to be banned from the gallery as a whole. Even better, you can take a look at our many generators focused on furries (for example: https://perchance.org/ai-furry-generator ), and you will see that animal genitalia is widely accepted. To finish it, take a look at the "Bad Dragon" toys: a mainstream sex toy company whose products almost no one sees as "zoophilia/bestiality", much less those who are already used to porn things.

However, in the rules of the "AI Furry Generator", the rules say that "Feral NSFW" is forbidden in the gallery. According to them "Feral refers to characters or creatures depicted with the natural body form of real animals — typically quadrupeds or otherwise non-anthropomorphic in posture and proportions". Therefore, I believe animal genitalia is the maximum NSFW they accept, and you must avoid posting it in the gallery.

In the end, that's it: Perchance does have some rules and means to try to screw some people, but they are somewhat weak, and in your specific case, you are almost completely safe, and the maximum that you may face is the bot refusing to engage with you or having problems to understand the concept of a felitaur, or having some problems in case you post an image in the gallery.

(Detail: about the images, for you to be able to see the NSFW images in the gallery, you will need to generate quite the high amount of images before, otherwise, choosing the "none" filter settings will do nothing, and you will remain stuck at PG-13 images. And if you use anonymous/private mode or similar, you will have to repeat this "generation -> enable" process every time you begin a new session.)

[–] arajaeyma@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I heard there's also the system in which an ID may be "banned" if way too many people ban it. It's sadly the only way of "report" we have in galleries, but know that it is indeed a thing. But I believe this is not your case. People must post "really unpleasant" (as in, very illegal) things for it to happen, and sometimes, the system "fails". Moreover, as for the possibility of someone not liking the content that apparently your gen is about, the chance is still quite small. Most people won't step in generators that are clearly not for them. For example, I neither try yours, or the furry one, and the furry one is VERY famous, and the reason is simply because I'm not really into men (at most, I'd try yours in case I ever want a hot self-insert or whatever), and I'm completely not into furry (at most, I'd force myself to try it to complete a commission, since making furry art is a common fate for artists in the web, and yeah, there are some specific ways in which I can see AI as art, so one day I may end making something I can say it's art).

[–] arajaeyma@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I'm saying this more because some people do worry. Not everyone use nicknames that are completely unrelated to them and all. Personally, I have accounts for "those websites" and accounts for general use, and on accounts for general use (either social media or even games), for reasons, I often (not always) use my "real name", real face and so on, so it would be quite problematic in my case.

My reasons for why they would be problematic are quite simple and not that bad, but there are those who, for example, live in places where certain things are forbidden.

[–] arajaeyma@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Anyway, just a tip: learn to "hide" what you were doing before on things you post online. Here you are anonymous (I believe), and people will only make jokes about "masterpiece, best quality, ultra detailed hentai illustration, seductive bride" (I for one think it's pretty ok to have desires for one's own wedding night, and it even makes me want to make "handholding" jokes). But that's not always the case.

If you post it on the wrong place, for the wrong people, it may end up bad. There are cases, for example, of people who became big jokes because they recorded themselves on their bedroom but they forgot to hide their dildos (cases like, family photo, online job interview, and so on). There's a chance your case is not far from it.

If you have no problem with this kind of thing, or if you use this account for the purpose of such things already, no problem. But I'm just warning you that showing such intimate side is not always what people want to do.

[–] arajaeyma@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

There's a "disclaimer", at least when you first open the private image gallery, saying that the gallery is stored in your device only, on your browser cache. The problem: browser cache is often erased by the browser itself to clear up space.

For that reason, you must always save your images yourself, either in your device, or on cloud. Given the nature of your image, and many other reasons, I recommend always using local storage, since cloud services tend to be too annoying with what you save there (Google for example explicitly forbids saving NSFW on Google Drive, and anyone who does so is only surviving through luck and they may lose their files at any time).

In the end, this looks like to be a case of it, although...

Upon searching "internal error opening backing store for indexeddb.open" on Brave, their AI gave the following forms of prevention:

  • Avoid force-closing apps during database operations.
  • Ensure sufficient disk space and proper file system permissions.
  • Use app.requestSingleInstanceLock() in Electron apps to prevent multiple instances.

And the fixes often included restarts, reinstalls, clearing cache, and many other things that also including "erasing things".

Upon looking at your screenshot, I notice that there are 99 tabs open, and there's a chance there's more and this is only 99 because of the limit in digits. And based on the kind of people who does it, there's also a considerable chance that you also have many unused apps and even "open but not being used" "windows" on your device, which makes the situation worse.

Therefore, I have the theory that the issue was likely caused thanks to the sheer lack of space on your device/browser, which caused perchance to glitch and erase all your things (in case it didn't come back after countless restarts).

Therefore, besides "start saving your images on your device properly", I believe that you should also close this absurd amount of tabs, since they may cause many problems. In case you want to save them, bookmarks is a way better way to save things you want to take a look later.