Your capital on hyperbole is misplaced, hun.
That's not going to make the argument dissociative with your logical trauma & tantrums, not against me anyway.
I don't know about you, but I still have some self-worth left. Now, if you don't mind, I'm blocking you. Your are wasting my time & energy.
“We are all slave of our own making; some choose to do something about it, while others don’t!” Someone must have said it
Now regarding the dumb argument you provided:
Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments that are fallacious. Often nowadays this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself.
Circular reasoning is a type of logical fallacy where an argument uses a conclusion as a premise, essentially repeating oneself instead of providing evidence or logical reasoning. It's a self-referential argument that assumes the truth of the conclusion, making it a flawed and unconvincing argument.
My references:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning
The pitfall lies in acknowledging their arguments, coupled with the desperate need to give value to the invaluable.
It's a hustle and a pyramid scheme.
Grammar, logic, and rhetoric are lost tools for their target demographic, who likely have an undeveloped prefrontal cortex.
The following AI tool can parse documents and use the Internet, and multiple LLM model to choose:
Yes! Yes, nobody is skimming. Let's blame a deceptive topic used to obfuscate responsibility as an escape.
I mean, it seems like someone must be buying into the illusion of everyone being the martyr.