This could be about Ubik.
Amazing! This is more than I expected, thanks for taking the time.
-
Super helpful. I have just enough chemistry know-how to understand. The resources I found were either over my head or not detailed enough, this is perfect.
-
I'm gonna try ALL the salts.
-
Good. Good to know. (oops)
-
Like if grass is the best dye but Big Green Dye doesn't want us to know. Or if there was a way to make red cabbage explode.
-
Perfect. I already have a lot of leftover cabbage. I simmer it in salty vinegar water for a dye bath anyway. (Before I add the poison.)
bonus: I'm gonna try both of these today.
Thank you!
Edit: Follow up question, if it's not too much. Do you know if there's something that makes certain dyes adhere to plant based fibres better than animal-based and vice-versa? My cabbage dyes suck for wool (even trying different mordants, including alum which, from my observation, sticks to wool and the dye stuff,) but adhere to cotton and rayon very well.
I disagree. I found it interesting on the topic of symbolism, as the author explains environmental symbolism is the lens through which he's viewing.
He's tracking a modern archetype, so the cultural references are evidence enough. Kinda like the "Cool S," some symbols don't have clear origins. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cool_S
I agree it would be more interesting to know the exact thought process of the designers and track the dissemination of the image. I couldn't find anything like that, so if you have more sources, feel free to share.
It does. It doesn't give one answer since the author explains it's an example of semiotic covergence.
It describes the different ways the same symbol evolved to have similar meanings across cultures.
I thought he was arisen from the bread.
That's why we have unleavened bread during passover.
Uh huh. Have a good night.
- Do not. The person you're arguing with is saying a pedophile is not a rapist, never said it was fine, and you're arguing with them.
2-3. See point 1.
- Actually, the way we use the term Fetish colloquially is how the term Paraphelia is used in psychology. A non-con fetish is a paraphelia. The reason I used 'non-con' is because, like pedophelia, it can be redirected in legal forms of sexual expression.
What's concerning is calling everything you don't like or don't understand concerning, and hinting that people arguing with you are pedophiles.
Again, you argued with someone who tried to point out pedophelia doesn't make someone a rapist. You brought up the nature of a fantasy as a point of argument, which I responded to.
Your entire last paragraph is ridiculous.
I believe they were accusing you of having pedophelia, not referring to your neurodivergence.
Lots of people have non-con fetishes. Doesn't make them rapists. Hell, who hasn't thought about murdering someone, or robbing a bank?
Good fucking thing we don't punish thought crimes.
Pedophelia is a paraphelia that requires treatment to manage/mitigate/overcome. Many people with pedophelia were young rape victims, themselves.
If we can all agree:
-
People don't choose to have pedophelia, and,
-
We would like to have less people with pedophelia,
Then we can also agree there should be easy to access treatments for pedophelia.
People trying to destigmatize the paraphelia and promote access to treatment are doing a lot more to make the world better than the ones calling every pedophile a rapist, even if they never act on it.
Reads like he was arrested for being an asshat and they might have found drugs.
Those drugs?
a police search found "half of an orange oval-shaped pill with 3 imprinted on it, consistent with a Schedule II amphetamine", and three "suspected cannabis cigarettes."
So... half a dexadrine and three joints, the bare minimum for a night out in Canada.
That look means I've scoped a nice place to keep my strap-on.
No worries. Didn't want you to accidentally imply anything you didn't mean to.