I thought he was arisen from the bread.
That's why we have unleavened bread during passover.
I thought he was arisen from the bread.
That's why we have unleavened bread during passover.
Uh huh. Have a good night.
2-3. See point 1.
What's concerning is calling everything you don't like or don't understand concerning, and hinting that people arguing with you are pedophiles.
Again, you argued with someone who tried to point out pedophelia doesn't make someone a rapist. You brought up the nature of a fantasy as a point of argument, which I responded to.
Your entire last paragraph is ridiculous.
I believe they were accusing you of having pedophelia, not referring to your neurodivergence.
Lots of people have non-con fetishes. Doesn't make them rapists. Hell, who hasn't thought about murdering someone, or robbing a bank?
Good fucking thing we don't punish thought crimes.
Pedophelia is a paraphelia that requires treatment to manage/mitigate/overcome. Many people with pedophelia were young rape victims, themselves.
If we can all agree:
People don't choose to have pedophelia, and,
We would like to have less people with pedophelia,
Then we can also agree there should be easy to access treatments for pedophelia.
People trying to destigmatize the paraphelia and promote access to treatment are doing a lot more to make the world better than the ones calling every pedophile a rapist, even if they never act on it.
Reads like he was arrested for being an asshat and they might have found drugs.
Those drugs?
a police search found "half of an orange oval-shaped pill with 3 imprinted on it, consistent with a Schedule II amphetamine", and three "suspected cannabis cigarettes."
So... half a dexadrine and three joints, the bare minimum for a night out in Canada.
That look means I've scoped a nice place to keep my strap-on.
This generation's Enumclaw incident.
The article begins with a history of communication and condemnation over differing values, so the author definitely doesn't say this only applies to the internet. The article just happens to be about the internet.
She doesn't say to never debate with strangers, either. That whole section was the bookend to her starting primer on violence over ideological differences, the point was that people are more than just a single comment on the internet.
She only mentions bluesky once. The article brings up, multiple times, the underlying motivators keeping people angry and engaged.
One example:
So, which institutions are we being tempted to condemn root-and-branch because of some mistakes and abuses? What large, trying-to-be-helpful-but-sometimes-failing associations would various rulers like to break up and destroy because they represent alternative sources of authority to their own narrative, and also there’s money to be made?
I don't even know where to start with the Palestinian genocide thing. Where did that come from? This is more about individual experience with the internet.
I can fix him.
If there's one thing I know about dogs, it's how much they hate being outside with their favorite people all the time.
It does. It doesn't give one answer since the author explains it's an example of semiotic covergence.
It describes the different ways the same symbol evolved to have similar meanings across cultures.