Wes4Humanity

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

If only there was a way to build some kind of vertical parking lot... Maybe even several levels... And then put the apartments above that

/s

Honestly, imo, areas of strictly commercial/industrial parking should be illegal... Put housing or solar over them

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm not sure we all understand how the whole "canary in a coal mine" thing works

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

They don't do the job they were voted in to do. They work for the same oligarchy as the Republicans. They are also inside trading criminals. I think the majority of potential voters ARE progressive (whether they realize it or not) and that's why so many sit out the elections... Because there's no one to vote for who will actually do the job they want them to do.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I wish we could see actual number of votes cast by each at m demographic... These stats could also be explained by the lower turnout, not necessarily more people voting for Trump in each demographic.

I.e.
2020: 8 Trump, 12 Biden=60% for Biden... 2024: 8 Trump, 4 Kamala= 33% Kamala Trump still got the same number of votes but it looks like he "doubled" his support

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

There were 3 choices... Nazis, Nazi collaborators, no non-nazis to vote for so not gonna vote

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The powers that be are in on it

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The stupid ones are angry too... They're just so stupid they are angry at the wrong things/people

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Should we all short it at the same time?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're probably right, must be time to be done with mere "protests"... How do threats of violence affect revolutions?

Hopefully soon we're done asking the enemies of the people to play nice

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago

Absolutely disingenuous to report this as "house Dems", as though the liberal (i.e. conservative) Dems are in on it. They are not. These are progressive Dems who propose this basically every year, and who are actually fighting for us, not corporations and profits. Liberal Dems then work with their Republican friends to shut it down. This is why liberal Dems are as much the enemy as the Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah... It would take some serious organizing... Probably need a serious org to take it on

 

He pissed

 

Is there any way to get unbanned or at least plead my case?

 

Thought, maybe we could all use a little inspiration from back in the day.

 

Do you think it would be possible (and how could we get it done?) to unite millions of people who collectively agree to target an individual company for a short time unless the company meets our demands? For example, for the month of March we all pledge to not purchase anything from Apple unless Apple does XYZ... Either they do it, or we tank their stock... Move on to the next company target

 

This idea has been kicking around in my head for a while, and I'm hoping some Lemmy geniuses can poke holes/ flesh it out with me.

Every person I've ever heard of works for and gets paid by some form of company. So instead of the company paying the workers and then those workers getting taxed, why not just tax it all to the corporations to begin with? Instead of hundreds of millions of individuals to think about, the IRS (in US) could just focus on a few million companies.

We the people democratically decide what we think is needed for a functioning society, and charge it to the corporations.

I'd say each company should be responsible for paying the same percentage of the bill as percentage of total "profits" they made. Like, if Apple makes 10% of all the combined profits of all the companies this quarter, they are responsible for paying 10% of the bill. Highest paid employee can make 10x what the lowest paid employee (including contracted and foreign workers) makes; more than that gets included in the calculation as part of the company's "profits". (So that CEO can still get paid absurd amounts of money, but the company will still pay taxes on most of it)

What if we created some sort of secure opinion/voting app where people go to cast their vote on whatever people think needs to be voted on. Should there be UBI? Should it be a token, living, or thriving wage? (Personally, I'd go with thriving and tie it to inflation) Single payer healthcare? All education paid for? Stop funding genocide? No more polluting the planet, or at least force companies to pay to clean up their own messes? When and where are companies allowed to market to us? Where should the threshold of agreement be to enact changes, 40% 50%+1 60%? Etc etc

Then we elect people who agree to simply enact what the people democratically agree on... And if the people don't agree, they'll stay away from it or leave it to the states. And hopefully someday we could build it out so that state and local governments work this way too.

I think we get bogged down on the 2 or 3 things we disagree on and allow that to mean we never get the things we DO agree on. Let's get the things we agree on first, and then continue debating the things we disagree on.

Also I think this would be a long term plan. 12 years would give us 2 full election cycles here in the US and would give zoomers time to grow up, settle, and start to really vote (hopefully with this new system).

Anyway, like I said, let's poke holes and figure out solutions. Thanks

view more: next ›