Mä ajattelin noi Mockavassa vaihtavat yhdensuuntaisiksi matkustajiksi, joille tuo yhteys sattuu tarjoamaan kätevimmän reitin Keski-Eurooppaan/-sta, ja siellä käymisen ensisijaisesti osoitukseksi lehdistölle siitä, että tällainen linja olisi toimiva. Pääosa matkustajista olisi vain Liettuaan asti meneviä. Siksi mä ohjasin tuon reittiehdotuksen koukkaamaan Vilnan kautta.
Nyt on tullut tähän tieto, että RDC jatkaa tämän junan ajamista, ainakin suurimman osan vuotta.
It's behind a ransom-or-pay-wall. Anybody care to refer the main points?
Tuossa artikkelissa mainitut menolisäykset ovat kyllä sellaisia, että niillä saadaan paljon kulujaan isommat säästöt.
Terveydenhuollossa ennaltaehkäisyyn panostamalla saa säästettyä ihan giganttiset määrät rahaa. Pienituloisten talouden parantamisella saadaan elävöitettyä palvelualaa, mikä vähentää työttömien määrää, eli vähentää työttömyysturvamenoja ja lisää verotuloja.
A question for others before I write a more thorough reply:
Wouldn't it be a good solution to move the directories elsewhere but then symlink them to their default locations? You'll need to think a bit about file permissions while doing that, but are there any other caveats?
For the asker:
UNIX-like systems such as Linux are intentionally made so that a directory can be on a different hard drive than its parent directory. So, you can have /usr/games, including almost everything on it to be on hard drive #1, but then define that /usr/games/quake should be on hard drive #2. The limitation is, you cannot have different parts of the directory tree on the same hard drive. So, if /usr/games/quake is on its own partition, you cannot have /home/plzgivehugs/artwork/bigfiles on the same partition.
...except, with symlinks you kind of can.
Yes, you do have to stop mindlessly repeating the propaganda.
In about three years' time it's been pushed back by less than half a year, from "spring of 2026" to "late summer of 2026". And that's the time when the Russia will run out of money. After that it will still take some time for the war to end. They won't get more soldiers, but it takes time for the old ones to die away. But, the prognosis for the end of the Russia's money has been pushed back by half a year. Probably during the next three years it will be pushed back by another half a year, then?
So, by 2028 we'll say it's time is around the change of 2026 to 2027. But whoops, that's in the past at that point.
But yeah, at some point one has to stop mindlessly repeating propaganda. Probably when you see that the 2026 did happen, as said in 2023, you'll do that.
KIA:MIA is a different thing, though. Neither of those two numbers includes the wounded.
Aikataulutiedot olivat tuossa alussa linkatussa artikkelissa. Nyt ne on sieltä poistunut, koska SBB oli ottanut yhteyttä artikkelin kirjoittajaan ja sanonut aikataulujen olevan vasta alustavat ja että niihin voi tulla muutoksia.
Mutta, Ruotsin puolella ratakapasiteetti on jo tilattu, eli Malmön ajat tiedetään. Eivät silloin muutkaan aikataulut paljoa voi heittää. Omaan silmääni Frankfurtin lähtöaika oli ihan järkevä. Oisko ollut n. klo 22?
For the last slightly over 3 years I've been reading stories about how the Russia's economy will collapse around summer 2025 or spring 2026. Now summer 2026 seems more likely, but that's hardly a very huge error.
It's very unlikely that the Russia's economy will make it to year 2027.
(And of course: a country's economy collapsing doesn't equal the country collapsing! But of course ut does mean the war cannot be continued, so the Russia will leave Ukraine's territory.)
It won't nuke Ukraine.
Firstly, in the Russia you need a triple order to launch nukes. Putin's order is not enough. And the two other people would not want to start a nuclear war. There's no way they'd okay a nuclear strike. And if Putin tried to convince them of that, they'd consider Putin having crossed a line that really does matter. And then there would be a headless Putin standing and a Putinless head rolling on the floor, really soon after that. Putin won't try his luck with that. He knows he'll just die if he does.
And secondly, it's unlikely that any of the nukes work. It's the same as with military trucks' tires. Everybody assumed they'd be never used in reality, so all the maintenance resources were embezzled.
Even if the Russia was to somehow assume that some of the nukes are not duds, they'd understand that they cannot know which one is the working one. You launch 1000 missiles, of which 3 detonate, and they happen to be the ones hitting less important targets. What happens next? Heh.
What do you mean "this time"? As compared to 1998? Or 1991?
Oletin, että on. Mutta näemmä ei, vaan Mockavan ajat on puolalaisessa datassa näemmä ilmoitettu Puolan ajassa eikä paikallisessa. Hm, pitää hilailla aikatauluja toiseen uskoon sitten! Hyvä huomio kyllä!