Teknevra

joined 4 weeks ago
MODERATOR OF
 

Are the disbelievers going to hellfire forever, and if so, wouldn’t this contradict Allah being All-Merciful?

 

 
 

A gentle reminder 🙏

We don't need 2-3 well prepared meals per day. We don't have to eat restaurant quality food daily.

Our beloved Prophet Muhammad ﷺ and his noble companions (may Allah be pleased with them) did not concern themselves with food out of desire for luxury, not because they couldn’t afford better, but because their hearts were attached to higher purposes. Simplicity was their choice, and contentment was their way.

The Prophet ﷺ said: “The son of Adam does not fill any vessel worse than his stomach. It is sufficient for the son of Adam to eat a few mouthfuls to keep his back straight. But if he must (fill it), then one third for food, one third for drink, and one third for air.” Sunan Ibn Majah 3349

Let’s revive this sunnah of moderation and shift our attention to what truly nourishes the soul. Instead of our parents or spouses spending hours in the kitchen every day, let’s value their time, lighten their burden, and choose to spend meaningful time together as families.

 

Most people in France were cheering on the men, or saying that this woman deserved this, that anyways her hijab should be forbidden, that she should be happy because muslims are even more savage and agress daily french women (?).

Media are doing everything to dismiss it and say that she wasnt aggressed because of her hijab.

 

Hi everyone, I have a question to ask Jews that believe Orthodox Judaism was true.

That now believe Islam is true?

What convinced you that Islam is true and that orthodox Judaism is false?

I ask because I’m thinking about converting to orthodox Judaism, but I’m also attracted to Islam.

There’s Jewish arguments that makes sense but there’s also Muslim arguments that makes a lot more sense especially the preservation of the Bible.

So may I ask what convinced you?

Please and thank you.

 

Transgender Law Center is the largest trans-specific, trans-led organization in the United States and assists, informs, and empowers thousands community members a year, and builds towards a long-term, national, trans-led movement for liberation.

 

Verse 24:31 lists people around whom a woman's clothing requirements are somewhat relaxed. It mentions, among others, "Male attendants who lack desire" or "...who have no physical desire..".

So, there are two conditions apparent - being an attendant and being a male who lacks desire. Most commentators focus on the second part - lacking desire.


The first thing to note is that the verse is worded broadly, perhaps intentionally.

Many people feel "those who lack desire" refers to eunuchs, but one wonders how that could be since eunuchs were apparently not common in all societies. It also assumes the existence of eunuchs without question (as opposed to the traditions that acknowledge slavery but encourage freeing slaves).


Several scholars mention "old men". This is perhaps the understanding most people would come to, but this assumes old men lack desire, which may not always be the case.

A few have refered to "subordinate/servent men" who "by virtue of the subordinate nature of their position" could not be bold enough to express their desire for the woman who is in charge of them.


While the last one may be a stretch, it shows how the verse has been interpreted.

Recently, many people have made the case that homosexual people or asexual people would fall into this category as well.


This raises several questions:

  1. There was a case where an effeminate man was allowed access to woman-only areas during the life of the Prophet (S). He was later not allowed into these areas when it was discovered that he was describing physical features of the women to other men. Some scholars say that this means that one must not have mental desire, not just lack of physical capabilities (it is unclear whether this person was a eunuch or not). The question therefore is, how does one know if a man lacks sexual desire?

  2. Many asexuals and homosexuals are actually capable of having sexual intercourse with a woman despite having no desire to do so (it is basically "mechanical" to them). Would that mean that such a person would not be in this category? This then further begs the question of how can one know who does or does not have sexual desire?

  3. Earlier in the verse, it says women can dress differently amongst "their womenfolk". Women can have sexual desire for other women as well. How would that work here?

Thoughts?

 

And where does this information come from?

Is it the Quran, or Hadiths?

 

This guy simply has brought Muslims a long way and been successful in portraying a better picture of Islam and Muslims, on how it has always preferred for the wellness of the humanity, oh but yes the extremists who are the slaves to the capitalists wanna talk trash on him now, how absurd and stupid!

view more: ‹ prev next ›