SieYaku

joined 2 months ago
[–] SieYaku@chachara.club 20 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

And they have a baby only 10 months old!! My baby is a little bit older but still, can't imagine if something like that just came and split us, it would be very traumatic for everyone.

[–] SieYaku@chachara.club 2 points 1 day ago

Great moment to work for it... And it is possible that a minor percentage than that also will be enough, according to the autor of the rule.

Another interesting interview for better understand this investigations is the one done by David McRaney in his podcast You Are Not so Smart. He is a great host and solve many wrong ideas that comes to peoples mind (me included) when you listen the rule for the first time.

You Are Not So Smart: 313 - The 3.5 Percent Rule - Erica Chenoweth

Página del episodio: https://youarenotsosmart.com/

Archivo de medios: https://stitcher.simplecastaudio.com/aa9f2648-25e9-472a-af42-4e5017da38cf/episodes/2512fbaa-aa0a-406c-9829-7c1d58ff70d6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&awCollectionId=aa9f2648-25e9-472a-af42-4e5017da38cf&awEpisodeId=2512fbaa-aa0a-406c-9829-7c1d58ff70d6&feed=N5eKDxJI

[–] SieYaku@chachara.club 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, and being a counter force within the intention of not permitting that to happen by generating division between the protesters for example. Still, the point of the 3,5% rule is not like something written in a stone, just a statical analysis who have that fact and investigation is not finished, and new events may demonstrate something else.

[–] SieYaku@chachara.club 3 points 1 day ago

Must be very interesting. I previously listen she in David McRaney's podcast YouAreNotSoSmart with not knowing what about that rule and understand that is not like a stone rule, and more an statistical analysis who shows that even minor percentages of people can make it. I'm sure that in the video that you refers, she solves many of the doubts that that such a statement generates.

[–] SieYaku@chachara.club 3 points 2 days ago

Wondering what you may mean by "The real story behind why Iran didn’t — or couldn’t — strike back". As long as we know they do, and they strike Tel Aviv.

And you're doing self promotion and expecting to getting pay to read what you presumably comply without offering anything here. I think that is not correct.

[–] SieYaku@chachara.club 3 points 2 days ago

There is bit difference between provoked and "self-defense*. We are just being said by Israel that every action they commit is by self-defense, even when they are attacking or doing a f**cking livestream genocide.

The narrative that Israel apologists uses don't have comparation (well maybe one famous genocide), so equal those terms is just misleading.

When she said provoked she means that the US do what's doing to Iran, I mean they are pretending to be negotiating crossing red lines that makes that impossible and when they are ready just attack. So, not, she was not saying Ukraine invasion was justified by "self-defense" like Israelis do, she was just illuminating what happens when you cross all red lines in aggression to other country.

[–] SieYaku@chachara.club 5 points 2 days ago

Thats not what you said, you are defending Israel and the violence they are doing all over. That's why you're just like them, you are ok blowing up everything but them you are acting like you don't.

If you oppose Israel genocide and the violence spiral they and USA are promoting, just do us all a favor and be coherent not justifying Israel's acts. And just in case you want to deviate attention, Iran must not have nuks, thats where we agree, but with these attacks they (Israel - USA) are just saying to Iran that diplomacy was just a joke and putting Iran closer to get nuks to dissuade this kind of military interventions.

 

A funny statement from Caitlin Johnstone about what to expect when west press publish an article of Israel actions.

Rule 1: Israel is never the aggressor. If Israel attacks someone it’s either a response to an aggression that happened in the past, or a preemptive attack to thwart an imminent aggression in the future.

Rule 2: History automatically restarts at the date of the last act of aggression against Israel. If someone attacks Israel it was completely unprovoked, because nothing happened before the attack on Israel.

Rule 3: Anything bad that Israel does is justified by Rule 2. This is true even if it does things that would be considered completely unjustifiable if it were done by a nation like Russia or China.

 

The Israeli army's Arabic spokesperson, Avichay Adraee, issued an evacuation order to all residents in Gaza on 13 June via X, declaring vast areas of the strip as “dangerous combat zones” that the citizens should stay away from.

In the map he shared, the red areas shown are designated as “dangerous combat zones,” and cover the majority of the Gaza Strip, forming a wide horizontal band that spans almost the entire region from north to south, leaving only a narrow strip along the coastline where people can traverse.

[–] SieYaku@chachara.club 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sorry but USA isn't being dragged into war... They have full knowledge and participation of what happens, so you must assume that is coming to a war for his own... It's not a pour innocent baby that have no involving... The opposite it's just being naive

[–] SieYaku@chachara.club 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

And when he/she said "all the evil those countries are doing" we must assume that is not talking about Israel nor USA, the major terror states, just the evil arabs. It's so nasty and incongruent that don't even justifies to waste your time to reason with a war propagandist.

[–] SieYaku@chachara.club 10 points 3 days ago

Also Dems if you read the article, don't forget that previously some of them worked hard to reach the same thing...

 

Following the opening salvo in Israel’s bombardment of Iran, many members of Congress rushed to declare their support for the Jewish state. Some went further, demanding the White House defend Tel Aviv from retaliation. A small number of lawmakers criticized Israel and urged Washington to stay out of the conflict.

The article offers a set of post from US politicians calling to support Israel and even a regime change. It also points out that a handful of lawmakers did oppose the Israeli strikes. Like Rep. Massie, who was the only member of Congress to point out that the attack Israel launched on Friday was an offensive war of aggression.

 

An influential group of GOP hawks has launched a behind-the-scenes lobbying offensive pressing President Donald Trump to not only back off his administration’s quest for a nuclear deal with Iran, but greenlight an attack on Tehran by Israel.

The campaign is raising alarms among Trump and his allies, who have launched a counteroffensive to keep the president’s diplomacy on track.

During a private lunch with the president at the White House last Wednesday, conservative talk show host Mark Levin told Trump that Iran was days away from building a nuclear weapon, an argument Trump’s own intelligence team has told the president is not accurate, according to an intelligence official as well as another Trump ally familiar with the matter. Levin urged Trump to allow the Israeli government to strike Iranian nuclear sites, which Trump has told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would torpedo the diplomacy.

 

Israel genocide wouldn't be possible without US unconditional backup.

The US has delivered 90,000 tons of bombs, guns, and other military equipment to Israel since October 7, 2023, to support the genocidal war against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, according to numbers from the Israeli Defense Ministry.

The ministry stated that the military equipment has included “armored vehicles, munitions, ammunition, personal protection gear, and medical supplies” and that the US support is “a significant component” in ensuring the Israeli military can continue the slaughter in Gaza.

[–] SieYaku@chachara.club 11 points 3 weeks ago

A lot more than under dictatorship law... And I guess than Just the necessary to continue doing their job

 

A cacophony of right-wing commentators now believes that El Salvador, under Nayib Bukele’s dictatorship, is the “safest” country in the Western Hemisphere. Bukele himself certainly wants us to believe it’s because he’s gone to war with the gangs. They’re all wrong — and disastrously so.

According to El Faro, the country’s most respected investigative outlet, the relative peace in El Salvador is not the result of a decisive war on gangs, but rather, of a secret pact negotiated directly between Bukele’s own Director of Prisons Osiris Luna and his head of the Social Fabric Reconstruction Unit, Carlos Marroquín, and gang leaders, starting in late 2019. He also took on similar negotiations with gangs as a mayor of San Salvador, from 2015 to 2018.

[–] SieYaku@chachara.club 8 points 3 weeks ago

Well said... So you can see how nasty are things right now in USA and in Israel. Thanks to lobbism and Trumps Admin "Israel First" and his total an "absolute commitment" to Israel genocidal policies.

 

On Thursday, Rep. Randy Fine (R-FL) appeared to suggest that Gaza should be “nuked” like Japan was during World War II in response to the shooting in Washington DC that killed two Israeli embassy staffers.

The congressman was asked [in an interview on Fox News if the shooting should change the course of Israel’s onslaught on Gaza. “Well, I think it speaks to the importance of the only end of the conflict is the complete and total surrender by those who support Muslim terror,” Fine replied.

“In World War II, we did not negotiate a surrender with the Nazis, we did not negotiate a surrender with the Japanese. We nuked the Japanese twice in order to get unconditional surrender, that needs to be the same here,” Fine added.

 

"There is no purpose to this other than to hurt Harvard and its students for not fully capitulating to Trump" Professor of Denver

Observers are sharply condemning a decision by the Trump administration, announced on Thursday, to terminate Harvard University's Student Exchange and Visitor Program certification, meaning that the Ivy League school will no longer be able to enroll foreign students.

According to the announcement from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the move also means that foreign students already enrolled at Harvard must transfer elsewhere. The administration alleges the school's leaders have permitted "anti-American, pro-terrorist agitators to harass and physically assault individuals, including many Jewish students."

Harvard has over 6,700 international students, according to data from the school, or 27% international enrollment.

 

Everyday AI become more and more common, but can we say no?

view more: next ›