Millennial check
Riverside
joined 3 months ago
Spaniard here. "Shoes-on" is mostly for when you have guests over. You'll wake up in the morning and use slippers, only put on shoes to go to outside, and when you come back home you'll remove the shoes typically in your bedroom (unless wet or dirty). But when you have guests over, everyone wears shoes typically, even hosts.
My family is off-grid and there have been extended periods the last two winters when it has simply been too dark for too long to depend on the solar without installing 50x more panels
laughs in ultrahigh-voltage power lines connecting deserts to populated areas
Seriously, China is already implementing this technology, we just need a few socialist revolutions and we can go full solarpunk
Most coal comes from the carbonipherous period, a period in which plants evolved wood but ~~microbes~~ funghi (shutout to Lyrl's below comment) still hadn't evolved wood-eating.
You can get new coal in marshes because I think the process to eat wood requires oxygen, and flooded areas don't allow for wood to decompose totally. That's why they can pull out wooden ships from 500 years ago from the bottom of the ocean in relatively good condition!
The mirrors on Earth don't transfer the energy using the air between the mirror and the collector, they just bounce the spicy photons which can travel even better in a vacuum.
But why leave the building initiative in the hands of the market+tax instead of just collectively making political decisions about what gets built where?
Why not remove the concept of landlords altogether then? Collectivizing the lands would be an even more complete version of land tax
I don't think most people here have any problem with collectively owned computing such as torrenting or SETI@home. The problem are private companies.
Rolling averages are used to smooth-out graphs with high-frequency noise. Since measuring the stabbings per month only gives you some 50 stabbings on average, maybe one month you'd get 30 and the next month 70 due to stochastic reasons, and so to make the graph smoother and more readable and long-term trends more visible, you can do a rolling average.
As for the "starting in 600", that's common practice and it's good as long as the axes are properly labelled, which they are.
Isn't the outcome the important thing? Like, clearly fewer people are dying/being hospitalized by knife attacks, isn't that ultimately the relevant metric?
If it wasn't for that we would either be homeless or be all living in my grandparents' house
Or you could become tenants from a wholesome small landlord! I wonder why that wasn't in your possibilities?
Are we the assholes if we rent our house in order not to force my parents to work 200 hours a week since salaries here barely reach 800€ a month?
So the people renting your apartment will be the ones working 200 hours a week instead? The lifestyle of your parents depends on other people paying them rent and you still can't understand why private rent is theft?
what we need is strong national regulation, not banning renting houses altogether
The "stronger national regulation" needed is the expropriation of rented housing to a collectively owned rent organization, and the masse-construction of affordable housing for social rent, and the rent of all of this housing stock at production+maintenance costs.
To be clear: most people would do what you're doing in your situation. But the fact that your family is escaping overwork and poverty through renting one of their flats simply means that another poor person who can't afford to buy a flat is subsidizing their lifestyle. It's not that your family are intrinsically evil people, it's that private rent is exploitative by its very nature.
Tenacitaaaaas!!