It is your choice to focus on a "not all zionists" take
That's not at all what I was saying. It's actually backwards from what I was trying to say.
Am I a Zionist (if I want peace, and justice for Palestinian victims of the current genocide, but I also don't want Israel to be destroyed)? Is Bernie Sanders?
I thought I had it worked out, how to sort of strike a balance so I can keep my focus intact and let it be helpful without wasting time constantly correcting its stuff or shying away from actually paying attention to the code. But I think my strategy of "let the LLM generate a bunch of vomit to get things started and then take on the correct and augmentation from a human standpoint" has let the overall designs at a high level get a lot sloppier than they used to be.
Yeah, you might be right, it might be time to just set the stuff aside except for very specialized uses.
Certainly possible
I'm also genuinely a little bit alarmed looking back now at my pre-LLM code and seeing the quality vs. the with-LLM code.
If Himmler and Goring look like big fuckin' weirdos here, you are correct. Goring in particular became a hugely obese morphine addict in the later stages of the Reich. Albert Speer talks about going to his house to meet him and this slovenly wild-eyed dude in a robe coming to meet him at the door, and being absolutely shocked that this guy used to be some kind of war hero.
Hans-Ulrich Rudel, the top Stuka pilot of the war, recalled twice meeting Göring dressed in outlandish costumes: first, a medieval hunting costume, practicing archery with his doctor; and second, dressed in a red toga fastened with a golden clasp, smoking an unusually large pipe. Italian Foreign Minister Galeazzo Ciano once noted Göring wearing a fur coat that looked like what "a high-grade prostitute wears to the opera".[184] He threw lavish housewarming parties each time a round of construction was completed at Carinhall and changed costumes several times throughout the evenings.[185]
He was just a big fuckin' weirdo. He tried to say at his trial that he didn't have anything to do with any of this "holocaust" stuff, and they had a good chuckle and sentenced him to death.
IDK, I just popped open a project from 10 years ago and it's perfectly clean, it's actually better than some of my modern code because it's not LLM-ified to save time.
I think it has a lot more to do with whether it was made in that "kind of crappy IDK what I'm doing" phase of programming. Some of your old stuff is going to be in that category sure. As long as you're out of that, however long it took you to get there or however far away it was in time, your code should be good.
Partial plate matches and fuzzy matches exist for this reason, I don't think this would protect you if you were genuinely doing serious crime. I looked into the guy a little more, he's standing up against corruption of the NYPD which is a pretty important defense of the social contract (and apparently he's gotten cited and threatened for it, because the NYPD doesn't feel like it should have to follow the law.)
Apparently it's true:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/17/nyregion/license-plate-vigilantes.html
Presumably, what was happening was that NYC cops and city employees just didn't get tickets, but then with the automated cameras, the computer didn't know that it was supposed to give free passes to cops, and so they started bending their plates so they could keep their above-the-law status. Which is what prevents them from getting in trouble for having a defaced plate.
Fuck the NYPD, in other words
Yeah, that sounds about right lol. All my python projects for years were basically writing C in python. It actually took me all the way up until I got to look at the code ChatGPT likes to generate that I learned idiomatic python. My first database project was based on the Unix philosophy, where everything was strings (no ID keys, no normalization), because Unix is good.
The client wasn't happy when they looked at the DB code lmao. Whatever, it worked, they still paid us and I didn't do it again.
My first thought was "that might not be a bad idea the way things are going, just so the feds don't know where I am going at all times." My second thought is that I'm genuinely a little bit surprised that Flock cameras don't auto-flag this stuff and send a notification for the person to be pulled over.
If you defaced your plate into another plate that was also in the DB, then maybe you'd be fine, at least for a while.
My point is that attacking someone as a "Zionist," now that Israel exists and has for a while, is kind of meaningless and dishonest at this point. Specifically because the label can mean a few very different things, you can ratchet someone into a viewpoint they don't actually hold by using the loosest possible definition when classifying them as Zionist and then using the most damning possible definition when attacking them for being a Zionist.
So are you saying "not all Zionists," then? I pretty much agree with everything you just said, I agree with all of that. Maybe more, truth and reconciliation is probably more productive, but my prescribed solution would be a little more inclusive of measured revenge to disincentivize repetition in the future. But yes we generally agree about all of that.
This was my central point: A lot of times, breaking down things into "isms" and "ists" can lead people to huge failures of thinking. I get why this Palestinian person is attacking Zionism. It makes sense to me. I'm just saying that once you start using a word that can both mean "a supremacist ideology created to destroy and conquer everything and everyone in its way" or also mean something so mild that you don't mind being identified with one version of it, that starts to become a dangerous word to use, because it helps people become more confused instead of helping them understand what is happening and what you wanted to communicate.
Like I said, I've seen people attack Bernie Sanders for being anti-Palestinian, it's not just some kind of idle speculation about how people could get confused by it.