LifeInMultipleChoice

joined 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Unfortunately if he did so Trump would pick his replacement. So it wouldn't be any better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's probably the choice I would have to go with, but when I was working with full boxes a lot, I started caring more about which pens were sturdy sharp enough to stab through tape and drag through it 50 times an hour and not end up looking at the end of your pen and find out the tip ripped off. Switching to a box knife over and over slows you down a lot and I needed the pen to cross out and document what was missing from the orders. Pens with caps are a pain for that as well, waste time.

I probably should have tried to find something like this: https://atechgo.com/products/multitool-pen-9-in-1-box-cutter?variant=31317899149448&srsltid=AfmBOorxxFa__k_qsBl8iPIi6kKPJc6A4Ah6nJ8WZ7gm3JZhWGj1qBZ_1AY

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Recipes are just food chemistry i suppose.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

A pint in the U.S. is 16oz. What's a British pint?

For us it is 2 cups in a pint 2 pints in a quart 4 quarts in a gallon. (People seem to struggle with remembering that until you tell them quart as in quarter, or 4 in a dollar etc)

Weights are fucked, but I usually just remember 16oz is a pound. Only drug users and chemists remember 28 grams in an ounce. So an 8 ball (1/8th is 3.5 grams). And depending on where you are ranges from 110-240 dollars. So you go to the store and buy a bottle of liquor (sold in metric units, and the store owner will stupidly call it a half gallon) but it's 1.75L, 1L or 750ml for $20-30. And you'll pass out 2 days later super dehydrated upset you wasted all your money.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

While I agree with your premise they did plan an assassination of the leader of a country back in the late 30s early 40s. Everyone was just cool with it because it was Hitler.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Your in a swimming pool, a guy is falling from a high rise, 20 people walk into a bar, and a bar says to the dinosaur, would you like a glass of milk?

Do you feel threatened. That's pretty much it. If you feel threatened by a guy with groceries there is likely something you need to see a therapist and work out. Also if you feel threatened by groceries, you likely should not own a gun, and especially not be carrying with you public. But if someone if trying to stab you with sharpened carrot or beat you to death with a tomahawk steak, please first consider running. Then if you have no other options because you think they have superhuman speed and strength and you twisted your ankle playing basketball yesterday. Plant your feet shoulder length apart, look at the center of his mass, and yell, Stop! In the name of Love, and hit him with the Supremes. Motown will solve most problems.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Lost you are, what I said is Truth. Denial you are in

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Morally correct, no. Legally correct, absolutely. Sorry mate, but it is 100% legal to shoot someone approaching you in your vehicle after getting out of their vehicle in a manner you considered threatening here. They don't have to touch you. The state has to prove that person wasn't going to hurt you, which they cannot do if you got out of your cyber truck after being called a name, and went over to their vehicle in traffic. That dumby in the OP already flagged himself as a threat in an online post. If they lived in a state that has castle law, someone could call him over and shoot him and get away with it because their lawyer would say it was premeditated do to there post history.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (7 children)

So your comparing someone saying they will drag you out of your castle and rearrange your face, to someone not entering your castle. They aren't comparable to me. The castle doctrine essentially puts the burden of proof on the state to prove you were not in danger. If someone breaks into your house, it is assumed you are in danger in states that use the castle doctrine. It isn't illegal to turn around in someone's driveway, therefore it is not illegal entry. The drunk person getting in your car scenario is a tough call. I'd say if the doors were unlocked and they get in the back seat then they aren't illegally entering.

The OP situation, you 100% can put a bullet in their head right in front of their kids and be legally covered. They don't even have to wait to get touched, they can shoot the person charging over to drag them out of the vehicle. The state has to prove the dead parent wasn't going to hurt them. The fact that they got out of their vehicle and headed towards your vehicle on the street would likely be all they needed to prove mal intent, the state wouldn't even try to prosecute that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

As soon as they attempted to open the car door or tried to pull that person out of their car anyone in the area can use deadly force to stop them in the state I live in right now.

"The Castle Doctrine

The Castle Doctrine extends the right of self-defense to your home, vehicle, or place of business in Tennessee. If someone unlawfully and forcefully enters your residence, business, dwelling, or vehicle, you're presumed to have a reasonable belief of imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury. This presumption allows you to use force, including deadly force, to protect yourself and others present on the premises. "

So in Tennessee you can actually shoot anyone who breaks into your house as well, even if they are just trying to steal your TV, the breaking and entering is considered an immenant threat to yourself or any other residents. Probably not a good idea to shoot the person in the back while carrying the TV, (nor do I think it's a good idea to shoot anyone) but the law is very much in the favor of whomever lives or owns the vehicle/ business/ residence.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

It's also assuming they win. If you physically assault someone they have the right to defend themselves or in many states fill them with lead. None of those situations are good for the children. Watching your parent get the shit kicked out of them or killed on the street isn't how you should be teaching your kids how to not get the shit kicked out of them or killed on the street.

view more: ‹ prev next ›