I use boost, no problems
Kobibi
Mate idk where you live but in the UK you aren't allowed to cycle on pavements. Call me a dick if you want but it's just how it is.
If you wanna use the pavement, get off your bike and walk. Dont get mad at me cos you don't like cycling on the road. Neither do I. So I walk.
Cyclists ringing their bell at pedestrians on the pavement is like cars honking their horns at cyclists in a bike lane
It's not your space, so don't impose on the people using it properly
I'm sorry that roads can be bad for cyclists, but making the pavement bad for pedestrians isn't the answer
If I'm walking on the pavement and a cyclist rings their bell to make me get out of their way, I'm gonna get mad
I know cars suck. But you're meant to cycle on the road - You're not supposed to cycle on the pavement. I don't care if you do if the road is horrible, fair play, but ringing your bell at me? It's my right of way, so no thanks
They've brought brought them back, at least temporarily. Got a six pack in my cupboard right now!
History is key, which is why in parliament square opposite the statue of Churchill there's a statue of Hitler
... Oh there isn't? Huh
“While casinos and junkets have for years served as vehicles for regional underground banking and money laundering, the proliferation of ... underregulated cryptocurrency exchanges has changed the game, allowing for faster anonymized movement of funds"
From a 2024 UN report on money-laundering in casinos in South East Asia
Money laundering with casinos and with crypto aren't necessarily separate issues, particularly with the rise of online and digital gambling.
Casinos can be and often are fined if regulators suspect money laundering - the majority have systems in place to crack down on it. Crypto is part of this arms race between casinos and criminals.
Expect =/= deserve
The black panthers open carried in part to expose the hypocrisy of a system that was already indiscriminantly violent towards black people
I think it's important to note that the BBC isn't 'state run media', if only to highlight the ways that it's more intertwined with the state than it should be.
The government officially holds some sway in the appointment of its chair, which is kinda sus. But the main issue I think is this more unofficial 'revolving door' appointment of it's heads and high level figures
They all seem to come from ex-government and business positions, very much from the same class and background as most of our political leaders
And as such, this same pro-status-quo worldview is present. Add to this that there are clearly many successions made to retain access to important figures..
The BBC in some spheres clearly feels able to critiscise the government, even quite harshly sometimes. But in other cases - notably gaza and climate change, activism etc - waves the same stick around
For my money it's not so much that the government tells the BBC how to report on this, per se, but that the editorial leaders of the BBC are of the same worldview and agenda of the Government leaders.
Although yes, there probably have been conversations over lunch at clubs and the vague threat of government interference if the BBC goes too far astray...
But above all, I think the BBC is against rocking the boat, and the boat in this case is neoliberalism