Couldn't find any info, so maybe someone here knows: Is QT statically linkable, in particular when used from Rust? That's something that I really value in fltk.
KillTheMule
I've no idea. I kinda assume AI is basically used everywhere, but unless explicitely stated one can seldom be sure.
Wait, what? Any more details about this, I’ve never heard about that before. Partially run Drop impls sounds like a big potential for undefined behavior, how could catch_unwind possibly cause that?
Yeah, no, I don't think this is true. It's the reason a double panic will cause an abort. The docs do recommend against using this for general error recovery, but there's no mention of any possibillity of inconsistent state.
I don't have anything to add, except that typst is awesome. And that 'accessibler' should be a word.
I did fill out the survey. Turns out I don't have a usecase for any of this, and therefore I'm in the "don't care" realm really, since I'm also not really appreciative of corresponding features in other languages I know. I'd generally be critical of the cost vs. gain balance here though...
And it really only concerns a certain subset - 32bit applications compiled with the gnu toolchain. I'm glad they keep the workload in check this way.
Huh? I might be misunderstanding something (maybe a joke, even!), but this is my lemmy account, that's kinda older indeed. How would that be connected to my mastodon account?
Huh haven't heard of this for quite some time, nice it's still going strong :)
I hope this is the first of many contributions we’ll have between the two projects and that we can continue to collaborate with and help each other.
Great to hear!
I wasn't on X, but now I've created a mastodon account :)
Man, I'd love that, if only the pay was better... but than again, if the pay was better I'd be even less qualified. But typst is awesome, all the best wishes for the team including the new hire :)
Ahh too bad, thanks for the answer though :)