InsertUser

joined 7 years ago
[–] InsertUser@en.osm.town 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

@ticho @hanke @openstreetmap

IIRC the photos stay hosted untill a week after the note is resolved. They are in the website if the developer

[–] InsertUser@en.osm.town 2 points 2 years ago

@Zwiebel @openstreetmap
I would expect ISO to be among the last organisations in the world to suggest that copyright should be waived for something or that there should be an open license.

Of course I'm not going to check in this instance because as a typical ISO standard it is obscenely expensive.

[–] InsertUser@en.osm.town 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)
[–] InsertUser@en.osm.town 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

@pietervdvn @openstreetmap Thanks.

I did think that a background map that emphasised water would be good, I didn't think of trying to get MapComplete to pick out the navigable ways.

Marinas, chandlers and boatyards would probably be good things to have. A (read only?) lock layer for context maybe.

I think mooring areas would be good, but it seems these are normally done on lengths of way, but MapComplete would be limited to adding points (AFAIK).

[–] InsertUser@en.osm.town 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@infeeeee @openstreetmap

Weird, so that's just a Firefox thing then.

[–] InsertUser@en.osm.town 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

@infeeeee @Tyoda @openstreetmap

My hdyc pie chart doesn't show: "Could not draw pie with labels contained inside canvas".

List-wise: JOSM, StreetComplete, OsmAnd, Potlatch, Vespucci, iD, JOSM (Reverter), MapComplete, Pic4Review and then the ones that are under 10.

[–] InsertUser@en.osm.town 3 points 2 years ago

@otter @openstreetmap

So they haven't announced a change or anything?

You have (supposedly) been able to create your own public transport files for ages.

[–] InsertUser@en.osm.town 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

@pietervdvn When I wrote that I'd got stuck trying to add questions _into_ the title. Which obviously went very badly.

I ended up looking at another example to see where the various bits of information were meant to go and then got the hang of it a bit more.

I also ran into some things where I thought I was completely misunderstanding another thing and it turned out to be a weird bug. I've typed up the one I could reproduce, but I also had e.g. 'TypeError: s[h[1]] is undefined"

[–] InsertUser@en.osm.town 1 points 2 years ago

@pietervdvn

I managed it, had to look at some examples to see how things were meant to work. I'll see if I can cobble together the layers I have done into a theme.

[–] InsertUser@en.osm.town 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

@pietervdvn yeah I was just trying to create one for the equivalent waterways tags, but I'm finding the studio really confusing.

[–] InsertUser@en.osm.town 2 points 2 years ago

@abeorch@fosstodon.org @abeorch@lemmy.ml @openstreetmap

OK, so it looks like the nautical view only shows the seamark tagging for that feature and the land based tagging only shows if you search for it. The waterway tagging appears not to be in use. I might put a request on the issue tracker for this.

Images attached but will probably only show in Mastodon.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aamenity%3Dsanitary_dump_station
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dsanitary_dump_station
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:seamark:small_craft_facility:category%3Dpump-out

view more: ‹ prev next ›