@NeatNit @gedaliyah @openstreetmap
F-Droid do provide more detail about why they warn that something has an anti-feature, but only make that easily accessible if you run their code natively on your device. If you're on the web interface you have to figure out which of the links in the external links section isn't actually external and look in there.
Their excuse for this is that their website can't parse their own file format that they invented for themselves.
@Tungmar @openstreetmap @geocaching_de
It looks better in the F4 map demo: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=50.8950203&lon=4.3415218&zoom=18&camera.theta=67.059&camera.phi=-106.857
Streets.gl has an ... interesting interpretation: https://streets.gl/#50.89508,4.34143,45.00,0.00,577.53
@Cheradenine @Tyoda @openstreetmap
I don't think that changes your underlying account ID.
Whatever you do you need to make sure that you are contactable through the email address(es) you supply. If there is a problem with some of your edits and you don't reply to queries you may have your account(s) blocked and all your edits reverted.
There have been many disputes between the way the iD developers want to do things and the community over the years, to the point where they are now unique in having a dedicated page on the wiki documenting all their controversial decisions.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Controversial_Decisions
I wouldn't pay much attention to it.
The main thing is to have highway=traffic\_signals either on the intersection node or on all the inbound ways. Any refinement beyond that is just a bit of a bonus.
Breaking up roads for turn restrictions, changes in the number of lanes etc is perfectly fine.
I've always found it a bit silly to break up roundabouts for route relations, but not everything supports leaving them intact.
@abeorch @pietervdvn @openstreetmap
Chandlers added read only as there's no real consensus on the best tagging, no repair facilities on the map yet.
@abeorch @pietervdvn @openstreetmap
I had a go but haven't finished it. The link should be kicking around in this thread somewhere.
The major thing I thought would be good but haven't included yet is chandlers because the tagging for that is a bit confused.
Also boatyards I guess.
@mischk @openstreetmap @openstreetmap@lemmy.ml @osm_tech
I've just spent a couple of hours editing and haven't had any issues.
@BitSound @openstreetmap
Depends on the layer. Some of the ones described as ortho imagery are provided by government sources and are really closely aligned to very well known survey points. Others aren't.
Even if you do have a layer done to a very high standard it could be older than some of the lower accuracy ones so there will be individual buildings that have been replaced or remodelled and the later source should be used.
@NeatNit @gedaliyah @openstreetmap
Oh, and they also deliberately buried the rollout of the new anti-feature in the middle of an obscure blog post rather than doing the responsible thing and prompting users to make a decision about it.
https://f-droid.org/2024/04/04/twif.html
@organicmaps is probably on borrowed time before it is also hidden from search.