Icytrees

More information from Australia, if anyone's as morbidly curious as I was. Do not click unless you crave depression.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-26/child-sex-dolls-sold-on-temu-and-shein/105636720?future=true

A few things could be happening here.

1. Vaginas lose elasticity as people get older. But this wouldn't explain depth.

2. You and your partners could have subtly learned better techniques for your bodies. I used to get cervical trauma way more when I starfished with spry young jackhammers.

3. Nerves. Women who are used to sex know how to relax and how to get themselves in the mood.

4. Size of the woman doesn't indicate the size of the vagina. Just like dudes and dick size.

5. Small sample group/cognitive bias. You haven't slept with enough women or taken proper notes, so your anecdote might be incorrect.

I don't think in terms of big/small anymore. As a teenager I thought anything longer than 6" was big. I'm wiser now.

Vaginas are super elastic, all different, and tightness/depth can vary by mood, age, exercise and time of the month — the cervix lowers during a period, so a cozy dick on one day might bottom out on another. Because it shapes to whatever's in it, even a 4" dick can be "felt" all around. Nerve density varies by the part, too, so a 5" dick that hits the good bits feels like more than 7" in-and-out.

Plus, there's girth and shape to consider. A curve feels bigger because of geometry, putting more pressure on the sides. There's more friction with a circumsized penis (not always a good thing,) and a prominent glans drags on the downstroke (a good thing.)

How it feels comes down to penis owners knowing how their dick works and communicating.

Almost any political entity can give a title. Maybe we can get an small incorporated town, academic institution or church to bestow one.

Sir Kiddy Diddler is good, but it implies knighthood and that's a whole thing. Someone could give him an honorary doctorate in Kiddy Diddling, the only question is whether that falls under science or arts.

He looks really happy. I wish him well.

Penis envy is a theoretical stage in female psychosexual development that occurs when they realize they don't have a penis.

The idea of pre-pubescent viet cong girls running around collecting soldier cocks in the night is even more terrifying.

Yes, I know, which is why I brought up the idea of inconsistent physics between universes.

I'm not questioning whether the paper's math is accurate. We both seem to agree the hypothesis can't be proven in the first place.

I am treating it as a thought experiment, which is why I'm questioning how math can prove a negative to a fairly ambiguous question in the first place.

It's in the realm of disproving determinism and flying spaghetti monsters.

What is the main point of the thought experiment?

If we consider a possibility from all sides, then whether or not we could similate a universe that follows different physics is one of those sides. We don't have the power to do that, but we can create programs that simulate different physics. Stands to reason that not every universe may follow the same fundamental laws.

I don't agree that it's equally unlikely to be the first as the last, either, if the universes branch off. A tree has thousands of leaves and only one trunk.

Doesn't this assume all universes follow the same physical rules?

Yes! This is called 5BX if anyone wants to look for books and modern resources. There are apps for it, too.

Those are very small condoms. Are we sure they're not for the pokemon?