Glitchvid

Streaming services pretty much top out at 80Mbps, but more typically are around 15≃20Mbps for even 4K content, so even if they straight quadrupled the bitrate for 8K content you'd only be hitting UHD BD rates.

I don't disagree that BD will not exist for an 8K market, but that's because physical media is being killed.

This isn't even getting into the actual mastered resolution of much of this content, which you're lucky if it's even in 4K, most stuff is still mastered in 2K.

There isn't a particularly good delivery mechanism for 8K, Blu-Ray tops out at UHD/4K, and streaming is so bitrate starved 8K doesn't even matter.

Most of the VCS ops in Hg are actually written in C.

GitHub is mostly written in Ruby, so that's not really a performance win.

Like I said, we're stuck with Git's UX, but we were never stuck with Hg's performance.

I don't think it's hyperbole to say a significant percentage of Git activity happens on GitHub (and other "foundries") – which are themselves a far cry from efficient.

My ultimate takeaway on the topic is that we're stuck with Git's very counterintuitive porcelain, and only satisfactory plumbing, regardless of performance/efficiency; but if Mercurial had won out, we'd still have its better interface (and IMO workflow), and any performance problems could've been addressed by a rewrite in C (or the Rust one that is so very slowly happening).

Further hampered by the Steam "discussions" that are an incredibly unmoderated cesspit.

Further, US national electric code states that a continuous load (3+ hours) is de-rated to 80% ampacity, so we're looking closer to 1400W.

The solution if you really need that much wattage in the US is to use a 240V circuit, dual pole 20A breakers are commonly available, Romex yellow is fine for 240V@20A, just gotta get a NEMA 6-20 outlet.

I've had failure rates as high of new BD discs, even.

The US BD pressing plant shut down a while ago and the new ones are very hit or miss, I've gotten several that were heavily scratched or otherwise unreadable – brand new in sealed case, from the only NA factory.

If they were a small or free service I wouldn't have much issue, but they do charge, I don't think it's too much to ask that they at least attempt to scrape the wider web.

Building their own database seems the prudent thing long-term, I don't doubt they could shore up coverage over Bing. They don't have to replace the other indexes wholesale, just supplement it.

They have smallweb and news indexing, but other than that AFAICT they rely completely on other providers. Which is a shame, Google allows submitting sites for indexing and notifies if they can't.

Running a scraper doesn't need to cover everything since they have access to other indexes, but they really should be developing that ability instead of relying on Bing and other providers to provide good results, or results at all.

Small web always returns 0 results for anything that isn't extremely broad, unfortunately.

I've been using Kagi for the last year+.

Personally, I wish they'd tone down the AI stuff that ruined Google, but at least you can turn most of it off.

Their results are okay, a little better than Bing, but obviously they're limited by their existing index providers, I wish they'd run their own spiders and crawl for their own data, since I think Bing fails on a lot of coverage of obscure websites.

In general I find the weighting of modern indexes to be subpar, though the SEO industry has made it a hard problem to tackle, I wish more small websites and forums were higher ranked, and AI slop significantly de rated.

Very interesting move, you really would think that a unified storage provider would scale very well, and hedges the business on both sides.

I've really liked WD, I exclusively use their enterprise HDDs and haven't had a single failure (bar one caused by incorrect shipping) and their SSDs been similarly good offerings.