EnthusiasticNature94

joined 1 month ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

Only teenagers? 😭

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 weeks ago (9 children)

I agree with Dr. Jey McCreight on the science.

But for determining truth, both sides are wrong here.

Dunning-Kruger is bad, but so is credentialism and appeal to authority.

Many people with PhD's have had Dunning-Kruger. Someone else mentioned Ben Carson being great at neurosurgery, but not politics.

A PhD doesn't make you infallible.

I am saying this as someone who is taking graduate-level courses and will be pursuing my PhD. When I'm correct, it's not because my future PhD causes reality to magically conform to my opinions - it's because I rigorously looked at the evidence, logic, and formed my own conclusion that better aligns with reality.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah, both sides are wrong here.

Dunning-Kruger is bad, but so is credentialism and appeal to authority.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Doing okay.

Just picked up my cat's ashes today, but also ate some pizza with my bf.

I did okay on my midterms. Got an 85%.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

So this is the manual that the bad tech support lines use. 😭

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Technology isn't there yet. Try again in 20 years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I'm not proposing anything specific, no. I said it was an example (and I even bolded the text).

I don't really have a stake in the specific example I gave, so I can't really comment much else on your critique of it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

Wake up, people. Reject mathematics. Reject formalism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

So would ASL, yet here we are.

The education system is for schooling, not learning.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 weeks ago

So would ASL, yet here we are.

The education system is for schooling, not learning.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

We're cooked. 😭

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

This is a really good response. Thank you.

I think we can have both the benefits of democracy being decentralized and resistant to systemic manipulation, and of technocracy having some minimum bar to deter ignorant individuals from harming society. There are trade-offs for sure, but currently, we the people ultimately voted for someone who openly said he'd impose tariffs (among other things).

One potential example (among many, many possibilities) is a system where academic organizations and think tanks stake their reputation to nominate candidates, and then the people vote on them.

For example, let's say the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) nominates a pro-tariff candidate to manage economic policy. And then let's say the people end up voting for them. After the tariffs wreck the economy, the reputation of the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) will deteriorate considerably. In the next election, the people will vote the candidate out and ignore future EPI nominations.

view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί