Electricd

joined 4 months ago
[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Free as in beer?

Free as in freedom, where everyone is welcome to access, contribute.

so the idea that anything stated there could possibly belong to someone doesn't exactly make sense. You can own the rights to a process, or a song, or own the right to produce something, but the composition of an object, the technology driving an innovation, or the background of music theory are facts, and statements around them are part of public discourse

This is false. While facts are facts and no one owns them (except for patents), it’s the formulation that you own. Plagiarism is about this. I didn’t want to focus on the legal aspect anyways, the license behind contributions is well known and I have no issues with it.

Your entire comment is not on the subject that I was talking about. I’m saying that the Wikimedia Foundation profits from volunteer work while they do very little, and I don’t believe that’s fair. I would much rather donate to contributors than to the foundation.

You should also know that non profits are really often abused and a way to pay less taxes. Many of them act like for profits.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 3 points 1 month ago

Most of it is habits

You’re used to windows so it doesn’t seem like that to you

If you do simple normie stuff, it’s super easy. For more advanced users, yea it’ll require some knowledge

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Then you have to accept Wikipedia is not free. I’m personally not willing to give them my IP, and I’ve been actively prevented from editing, fixing and adding information on the website.

The sole knowledge that they don’t use the money to fund Wikipedia should be enough to understand that your donation is not needed. When you donate, you think you donate for the great content, and maintaining Wikipedia, but that money isn’t used for that, or at least in a very small proportion.

Wikimedia foundation doesn’t write articles and do very few moderation. Iirc there are less than 100 employees working on the site. They’re financially profiting from the volunteer work people do. Just like Reddit.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net -1 points 1 month ago

Obviously, preserving Wikipedia is important. Donating is not the way to do it though

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

"Fascists criticize Wikipedia, therefore all criticism is done by fascists"

I criticize them and I do not share the ideas you’re saying I do.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net -3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Nope

Wikimedia the tool is great, the foundation behind it, not so much

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net -4 points 1 month ago

Which effort? 99% of it is volunteer work by people not at the wikimedia foundation

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net -1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

The website itself needs a really small amount of money. Most of the money goes for other stuff which might not seem useful to you.

They make it seem like they don’t have money but it’s quite the opposite: they increase their spendings based on their revenue. They have enough for many years.

Don’t donate to them. There are far better ways to spend your money than a foundation that doesn’t really do anything on Wikipedia and that still actively blocks anonymous proxies.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 1 month ago

They’re always on sale

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you have competitors, they will develop and have better products / service than you

There’s always room for improvement, and improving requires resources

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What are these characters

view more: ‹ prev next ›