Electricd

joined 4 months ago
[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 7 points 3 months ago (15 children)
[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 10 points 3 months ago (5 children)
[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 5 points 3 months ago (8 children)
[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 3 points 3 months ago (5 children)
[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 2 points 3 months ago

I mean yea, I'm not for it in the way "all uses are correct", but rather that it's a valid technology to use for some cases and I have a positive feeling towards it. Big companies replacing artists to make more profit sucks, for example

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 3 months ago

Ca aide un peu mais ça puera toujours

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 3 months ago

I don't want to start a debate on this subject, at this time. Others will.

I'm just posting to show that not everyone thinks the same. That's it.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I would agree that big companies using AI to replace people is bad, but using AI to be more productive and learning/simplifying things is not

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 3 months ago

Sometimes it's the opposite, bad review but positive message

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

someone is running the blockchain at his own cost

That’s right. There’s no direct incentive to help the blockchain, unless you hold some coins, and in that case you do have an interest in doing it

very few people can do this

I would argue otherwise. This isn’t POW so costs are a lot lower, and people can ask for donations

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net -1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

It is not though

view more: ‹ prev next ›