DeltaWingDragon

joined 2 years ago
[–] DeltaWingDragon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Are you an alchemist?

Damn Small Linux has TCC on it, but I'm not sure if it's compiled with it.

You can probably configure Gentoo to compile all software that you install with TCC, but the initial "stage3"/"bootstrap" components are compiled with GCC.

Oh yeah,
wow,
wow,
wow,
this is a computer.

[–] DeltaWingDragon@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What's your name?
Where do you live?
What do you like to eat?

I am the bone of my fishing rod
Carbon fiber is my body and nylon is my blood
I have created over a thousand hooks
Unknown to Death,
Nor known to Life.
Have withstood pain to create many reels
Yet, those hands will never catch anything
So as I pray, Unlimited Fishing Works!

What about "bastard" and "penguin"?

[–] DeltaWingDragon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

TLDR:

The new flaws are CVE-2025-6018 and CVE-2025-6019.

The first is a vulnerability in PAM. The second is in libblockdev.

The PAM vulnerability only affects SUSE Linux systems, other distros are not affected.

Vulnerable versions of libblockdev are 2.25-2 and 2.28-2, newer updates have it fixed.

If the secret's out, she has no leverage! Shout it from the rooftops!

Is that a Rainwing?

Don't press X, it's insecure to SSH attacks. Press Wayland instead.

  1. Boot live USB
  2. Find the correct partitions using lsblk (you may only need the root partition)
  3. Mount them (root goes on /mnt, others go within the root)
  4. chroot /mnt (if permission denied, run it with sudo)
  5. Search the logs or journals for the error (journald was the first to fail, maybe check its logs first)

If you get errors like "no proc filesystem mounted", then you also need to mount special filesystems before entering the chroot. Run these commands as root:

mount /proc -t proc /mnt/proc
mount /sys -t sysfs /mnt/sys
mount /dev -t devtmpfs /mnt/dev
 

quote, ampersand, less than, greater than " & < >other text goes here, this is unaffected

 

Quotation marks and other symbols, when typed in the title of a spoiler tag, show up as broken HTML entities.
This only happens on the normal website. Other Lemmy UIs (Tesseract, old-reddit style, Photon, Alexandrite) are not affected.

Examples of characters:
" becomes &quot;
& becomes &amp;
< becomes &lt;
> becomes &gt;

Example occurrence:

quote, ampersand, less than, greater than " & < >Expected correct result: " & < >
Expected erroneous result: &quot; &amp; &lt; &gt;

Warning: The following spoilers contain full-page screenshots of the phenomenon in question. Do not open on a slow or metered connection.

Normal website section.On sh.itjust.works:

On lemmy.world:

On lemmy.blahaj.zone:

On lemmy.dbzer0.com:

Alternative UI section.On sh.itjust.works, Tesseract version:

On lemmy.world, old-reddit style version:

On lemmy.world, Photon version:

On lemmy.world, Alexandrite version:

3
Quotation marks test (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by DeltaWingDragon@sh.itjust.works to c/test@sh.itjust.works
 

Double quote section

"quotes"
"quotes in italics"
"quotes in bold"
"quotes in bold italics"
~~quotes in strikethrough~~

"quotes in a header"

"quotes in a block quote"
"quotes in code"

"quotes in a code block"
"more quotes in a code block"

"all the quotes in a spoiler""quotes"
"quotes in italics"
"quotes in bold"
"quotes in bold italics"
~~"quotes in strikethrough"~~

"quotes in a header"

"quotes in a block quote"
"quotes in code"

"quotes in a code block"
"more quotes in a code block"

 

My main focus isn't on quality of results.

The real problem is, whenever I type a query that's even the slightest bit out of the ordinary, I get no results. Google, Duckduckgo, Startpage, Searx, all of them.

It strains credibility that these advanced pieces of technology could not find anything among billions of websites, when in the past, less-advanced versions of these engines could find results for similar queries among smaller numbers of websites.

To reiterate: My problem is not with SEO, or spam, or AI-generated websites, or irrelevant results. My problem is getting no results much more frequently than in the past.

 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/37176001

This was created by u/SenecaR0cks on Reddit, I do not own it

Source (reddit frontend)

 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/37176001

This was created by u/SenecaR0cks on Reddit, I do not own it

Source (reddit frontend)

 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/38304008

This was created by Dschunai on Deviantart, I do not own it

Source

 

This was created by Dschunai on Deviantart, I do not own it

Source

 

Original title: Presenting General Falcon of the SkyWings. The latest OC of mine bought to life by the highly talented SinisterEternity over on Twitter! ^^ Love how they managed to capture the fierce expression, and the spear looks even better than how I'd imagined it! https://twitter.com/SinisterEterniT

This was created by SinisterEterniT on Xitter, as a commission for ShadowClaw98 on Reddit; I do not own it.

Intermediate source (reddit frontend)

Original source (xitter frontend)

 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/37507334

I'm trying to generate AppArmor policies to secure my "major/internet-facing" programs.
Most of those programs are Flatpaks.
Flatpaks already have their own sandboxing mechanism, which uses bwrap and XDG portals.
Does AppArmor have any weird interactions with Flatpak, e. g. blocking too much, or blocking too little, or being unable to block anything without rendering the whole program unusable?

view more: next ›