DeckPacker

joined 3 months ago
[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Or in other words, capitalism

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago

Nice!

She was a Zionist, so not worth voting for

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 31 points 2 days ago

They do hate democracy

1
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by DeckPacker@piefed.social to c/soulism@multiverse.soulism.net
 

I stopped believing in reality when I learned about soulism. I now believe that I have wings.

But so far it seems like I don't yet believe in them hard enough. So maybe I need to force myself to believe in them?

What do you think about jumping off the Eiffel Tower so that I can finally reject the last reality-propaganda?

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, you're totally right!

Our president should kill more people

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They aren't nearly as unsafe as people think they are and I think they are completely fine.

BUT it still doesn't make sense to build them, because renewables (especially solar) is so much cheaper, so we should focus all our energy on expanding that instead of nuclear.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 18 points 5 days ago

In addition to this not really being a showerthought, this post is not really a shitpost either

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago

Cause they don't care about winning. They just want to uphold the interest of capital.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 41 points 6 days ago

standing up to Israel amid accusations that it was carrying out a genocide in Gaza.

Yeah, shure Guardian, these are just "accusations" from crazy leftists.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, what's up with that? I know, that Mozilla is hopelessly corrupt, but what about the Linux Foundation?

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Not individual people, really. It's the capital owning class, that tries to push bigotry to protect their own power.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Isn't that kind of the definition of a revolution?

That those in charge won't allow it?

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What I found much more interesting than the new subscription, was all their weird obsessive behaviours the author described, which seem to almost normalized in her mind.

Like memorizing all the followers of your ex and checking regularly if they have new ones, to see if they have a new relationship. Or checking, if your exes look at your stories.

I am very glad, I am not involved with social media (and most of my friends as well), because it seems to exadurate your worst impulses in a way, that I would have never thought could be normalized in our society.

 

The internet is mostly known for being a nightmare for your privacy, but I also think there is another side to that coin. I mean, it is insanely easy (and common) these days to do all your internet communication with messengers, that have pretty much unbreakable encryption (Signal). That was not possible for the average person before computers and the internet. The government could easily read all you private letters.

Also, all our web traffic is fully encrypted with https (although that is more of a security than a privacy thing) and most modern phones automatically do full disk encryption for your files. It is also trivialilly easy to use a proper end to end encrypted cloud storage (proton, tuta etc.) or even use unsafe cloud storage like Google Drive as long as you encrypt your files locally before uploading.

I know, the internet is still a net negative for most peoples privacy, but it is pretty cool how far we've come with encryption.

 

If you have any feedback, feel free to post it.

 

So me and some friends are currently planning a trip through Europe. Nothing is really set in stone yet, our first question is if we want to do a roadtrip with a camper-van or an Interrail trip.

I guess the advantage of a train would be, that it would be a lot more enjoyable to cover larger distances than with a camper. I thought, maybe it would be really cool, if we did like a larger tour through Europe, so I researched a bit and planned a hypothetical trip through Germany (where we live) to Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and back to Germany.

That sounds like a lot, but with the train routes, I looked up it would be doable with only 9 travel days, 4 of which would take the whole day (10-12 hours) and 5 of which would only take half a day (4-6 hours). I thought, that could be quite reasonable and it would be a great adventure type trip.

Do you think that could be cool, or would it get exhausting to quick?

 

So me and some friends are currently planning a trip through Europe. Nothing is really set in stone yet, our first question is if we want to do a roadtrip with a camper-van or an Interrail trip.

I guess the advantage of a train would be, that it would be a lot more enjoyable to cover larger distances than with a camper. I thought, maybe it would be really cool, if we did like a larger tour through Europe, so I researched a bit and planned a hypothetical trip through Germany (where we live) to Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and back to Germany.

That sounds like a lot, but with the train routes, I looked up it would be doable with only 9 travel days, 4 of which would take the whole day (10-12 hours) and 5 of which would only take half a day (4-6 hours). I thought, that could be quite reasonable and it would be a great adventure type trip.

Do you think that could be cool, or would it get exhausting to quick?

view more: next ›