DFX4509B

Matrix, also PeerSuite if you don't wanna leave a paper trail as PeerSuite discards your sessions by default.

She doesn't even deserve to get suspended for basically defending herself from someone making CSAM of her, let alone expelled. She was in the right and should've gotten off scott free, the guy making the CSAM is the one who should've been expelled, on top of getting bad-bad charges for it, which he did get charged for it.

Thanks!

Thanks!

He got charges pressed on him for the deepfake porn, so potentially he got a 'bad-bad' charge, as AfterPrisonShow puts it.

Thanks!

So expel the victim of a potentially life-ruining act and also a potential crime, and not the person making the deepfake porn. That makes perfect sense. /sarcasm

Really, that deepfake porn is going to do worse damage to someone who isn't even in high school yet, than a slug to the face ever will; that black-eye will heal, the reputational damage caused by someone making deepfake porn of you, not so much, and deepfake porn is a crime in a lot of places to boot.

Oh, and btw, that person was let back in on probation with that expulsion still on her record, if I were in charge of that school district, I would've expunged her record and let her back in with whatever achievements she would've had prior to expulsion fully restored, assuming that's possible, as her acts were fully justifiable IMO, and instead I would've expelled the person making and posting the deepfake porn, and potentially pressed charges if deepfake porn is illegal in a given state/province, which is an act that's far worse than slugging a person as it causes permanent damage to a person's reputation; like I said, a black-eye will heal, reputational damage caused by deepfake porn won't.

UPDATE: Charges were pressed against the guy sending the deepfake porn.

Lafourche Parish Sheriff said one student was charged with ten counts of unlawful dissemination of images created by artificial intelligence in September.

Thanks, and I'm using both; crayons, oil pastels, colored pencils, and even markers are all being shown off here.

A medium I haven't used in forever, and only because I haven't had fixative for a while, is chalk, and I would really like to pick that back up at some point.

How is it acceptable anywhere for someone to be expelled for hitting someone else, in a scenario like this where the cause is completely understandable and justifiable? If anything, the kid making deepfake porn should be the one expelled because that kinda thing can be legitimately life-ruining for its target. The person being expelled had every reason, right, and justification to throw hands.

I'm probably sounding like Ailurus here, but this is screwed up.

Also, isn't deepfake porn a crime in a lot of places even if it's of adults, and not of kids like in this case, which CP is already hella illegal on its own?

Given MS has been testing Windows on the Cloud in the enterprise space for a while now, I wouldn't be shocked if future major Windows versions, ie. Win12, became cloud-based.