Corndog

joined 3 years ago
[–] Corndog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Nothing Phones seem promising. Although their models make no sense. They have main phones, mid phones, budget phones, and then a whole sub brand called cmf that has ITS OWN phone hierarchy.

At the very least they are different and trying new things.

[–] Corndog@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

SomeBODY one told me-

[–] Corndog@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Quit screwing around.

[–] Corndog@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

... Politicize everything? A guy killed a political figure for political purposes at a literal rally.

[–] Corndog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sea Bear. Gets me every time.

[–] Corndog@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Maybe after I choke him with this that God damn song will finally get out of my head..."

[–] Corndog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Saw this a few months ago and can not get it out of my head. Absolutely brilliant.

[–] Corndog@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I haven't looked into the specifics of these policies, so I could be wrong, but I'd say no.

This graph doesn't really take into account everything it should IMO. The massive tax cuts to the wealthy are going to dramatically screw over people with lower incomes, because there'll be less money overall. I believe Trump's case would involve making up that deficit with really high tariffs on things, especially Chinese goods. This means that, although your taxes would be slightly lower on paper, you're spending a lot more money for literally everything that's made in China (or contains parts or materials from China). Typically tax cuts for the wealthy also involve money leaving crucial areas for lower income areas, like schools and infrastructure. The Harris plan (I believe) is revenue neutral, meaning for you it's literally free money with no downsides. In her case the extra money comes from slightly increasing the tax rates of the wealthy (as you can see here).

It's also worth noting that your income is taxes in the brackets it falls in. The first $39,000 is taxed at that (lower) rate, then the next bit is taxed in the next bracket, etc. Breaking the $140,000 mark doesnt mean all your income is now taxed at a higher rate. I THINK this is taken into account in this graph, but I haven't looked into it to be sure. I wanted to mention it though because it's a constant point of confusion for people.

Hope this helps.

78
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Corndog@lemmy.world to c/android@lemmy.world
 

One of my favorite aspects of folding phones is the return of the fingerprint sensors built directly into the power button. This is objectively the ideal design, for reasons I assume I don't have to explain.

Lately, however, the novelty of folding phones is wearing off and I'm starting to think I'd just like something lighter and sleeker. Are there any recommendations for a phone with a power-button sensor that still has good specs and cameras?

Edit: for the purposes of this post, physical sensors on the back of the phone also count, since they can wake the phone and unlock it simultaneously.

And to clarify (I thought this was a thing everyone just inherently agreed on), the benefits of physical sensors are:

  1. accuracy. A physical sensors will always be more accurate (and thus have fewer issues) because it doesn't have to work THROUGH the screen. This has been improved a lot with newer technologies like ultrasonic readers, but it is literally impossible to be better than the same technology utilized without a screen in the way.
  2. wake/unlock in one motion. Since it's also a button, it can wake the phone and unlock it in one motion, rather than 2 separate ones. Again, newer tech has sort of worked around this with things like lift to wake or just having the sensor area ALWAYS scanning so you can unlock it from sleep regardless, but these are clunky software implementations that rely on your phone constantly actively trying to to figure out whether you're doing the thing or not, so it again can't be as efficient as just a normal button. Battery impact for these is also pretty minimal for the most part, but it's still not zero.
  3. tactility. You can feel the button, and manufacturers can put it where your hand naturally rests, meaning that you can unlock the phone BEFORE you have even taken it out of your pocket.
  4. cost. Physical sensors are hella cheap y'all. The technology to read the ridges on your finger through a sheet of plastic and glass is (turns out) kind of expensive. We're all being forced to pay for this dumb gimmick.
  5. durability. Screens get scratched and dinged up, which compromises the sensors ability to read. Physical sensors on the other hand are basically the most durable part of the phone. Again, mostly a non issue on newer phones, but it's yet another thing manufacturers have had to dump money into working around (and thus charging you more for).
  6. not impacted by screen protectors, rain on the screen, etc.
[–] Corndog@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

... Anything? That's.... That's what currency is?

[–] Corndog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Microsoft launcher is super underrated IMO. Lots of customization. I use it for my foldable, but it's a bit hit or miss sometimes (scaling of folders sometimes gets messed up going from open to closed).

[–] Corndog@lemmy.world 123 points 2 years ago (11 children)

As much as I love shitting on the French for being terrible with numbers (seriously, how the fuck is the word for '99' 'four-twenties, a ten, and a nine'?!?) this one seems intentional so you can feel when you run out.

view more: next ›