ConstipatedWatson

joined 3 years ago
[–] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Since I've been using ublock origin, no script and, more recently, a VPN service, I hadn't even noticed Do Not Track had been deprecated!

I also didn't notice it had been replaced with something called Global Privacy Control which appears just as doomed to me since it's only enforceable in California (though the Wikipedia cites one case where it's been used to make Sephora pay).

[–] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I too sometimes check the time to see if it is realistic, since the only character with a real chance of surviving underwater is Guybrush Threepwood. It kind of looks implausible in every action movie, though

Right now I'm not sure this is my favorite because it's late and I am not thinking clearly, but I've watched Data in command countless times, so it's certainly one of my favorites

Part 1 in HD

Part 2 in HD

This is stunning!

It's also an incredibly curious phenomenon that if you turn your camera just a few degrees you get an entirely different picture of Saitama 😁1000038033

Hahahahaha! You're damn right!!!

I can only give you an upvote!

[–] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well, it's not a trilogy yet, is it? Anything might happen and the third movie could potentially be cancelled (it won't happen, but it wouldn't be the first time some important project didn't make it).

You should call it so only when the third one has been released!

It's really not nitpicking because it feels like journalists are becoming invisible

[–] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)

This is starting to bother me. In a matter of minutes, I found this other post on Lemmy which is about another Variety article which must also be AI slop or really poor writing since it says that "Spiderman across the spider verse" is an Oscar winning trilogy!

The third one is still in production, but yeah, it's already won an Oscar...

Probably Nolan's explanation that he could make it is in her words because she told Bane she wanted him to survive a bit longer.

I don't even want to imagine the kind of pain you get from being stabbed, but I know I sliced my index finger this year while cutting bread and it was an immense pain (for a short time)

[–] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're right and I know it's fiction and not realistic, but since we're shown he's suffering while she stabs him, it still bugged me because I imagined him bleeding all the way

That's a unique point of view, thanks!

You also just unlocked a memory of mine: a close friend's mom once got stabbed close to the heart by a mugger. She went back home and drove herself to the hospital and the nurse was shocked since she couldn't understand how my friend's mom made it in her condition.

I guess sheer determination can do miracles!

[–] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, it is a meme kind of thing in the How It Should Have Ended YouTube channel and often given as an explanation that he can do anything he wants (putting him on par with Superman). Here's a post about this

 

Apologies if this is not an Ask Lemmy worthy question, but I couldn't guess an appropriate community to post it to and welcome suggestions to where to move such a question to.

Question is as in the title: how could Batman survive what really seems like a deadly stab by Miranda Tate (=Talia Al Ghul) at the end of the movie and still have the strength to go chase the bomb, the lucidity to set up the autopilot and the coordination to jump off of the bat(wing) to safety?

Wouldn't he have bled to death (and very quickly too, even if she was trained to miss internal organs)?

We're shown that she twists the blade too and he feels the pajn (so the armor didn't really protect him).

Of course, the standard joke answer is that he's the Batman (so he can take it when others can't).

The movie is fiction and not intended to be realistic, so there really is no need for an explanation, but at other times it explains things to us. For example, the autopilot explanation at the end of the movie or that, even if it is unrealistic to heal his spine and be able to withstand several botched falls from prison, at least we're told that he's nursed back to health by the doctor inmate.

[–] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Now that's amazing, since I thought it was a much older concept!

I guess I never heard it linked to poverty (though it makes sense), but just a general statement about if something is of higher quality will last longer than several cheap versions of it.

I still can't fully believe such a statement is only 31 years old: maybe it was a common sense statement before?

 

If AI and deep fakes can listen to a video or audio of a person and then are able to successfully reproduce such person, what does this entail for trials?

It used to be that recording audio or video would give strong information which often would weigh more than witnesses, but soon enough perfect forgery could enter the courtroom just as it's doing in social media (where you're not sworn to tell the truth, though the consequences are real)

I know fake information is a problem everywhere, but I started wondering what will happen when it creeps in testimonies.

How will we defend ourselves, while still using real videos or audios as proof? Or are we just doomed?

 

Lots of superheroes are "children of the atom" in the sense that they derive powers from some sort of radioactivity (think Spiderman or Hulk or even Daredevil) while others are just born with powers without explanation (X-Men, Thor, Superman, Aquaman, Wonder Woman).

Who is a superhero that is somehow grounded in reality, meaning that they could "potentially" make sense (either their origin story is believable, even if it has some obvious gap to make a super power happen, or their power is somehow limited or constructed in a "reasonable" way).

I guess with these restrictions, Batman would be OK since he's got no superpowers, but he's insanely rich and therefore can both train himself and have access to sophisticated gadgets, but can you think of less obvious ones (even if they're minor characters)?

Thanks for reading this!

Edit: thanks for all the answers and apologies for the slow replies. I've had a couple of complicated days. I'll now go through answering you. Several people made me realize I hadn't been precise in what I meant and helped with their answers. I was looking for superheroes or superpowers that are somehow "believable" in that they're either constructed in an unexpected way or in a way that you could almost accept as plausible

 

Since a few days I've not been able to see my up votes. If I go to my profile, I see the sum total of my comments and of my posts, but next to them I see two zeros.

This seemed to coincide with the Lemmy.World update.

I logged out and back in more than once, but it doesn't change this issue.

Has this happened to anyone else? If so, how did you fix it?

Thanks anyways for reading this

 

I unfortunately live in a very polluted area, one where air quality apps mark in red and recommend that I never get out of my lair.

When it rains enough the air quality becomes more bearable and here comes the question: where does pollution go when it rains hard? Does it get pushed to the ground and stays there? Does it get embedded in the water (so instead of breathing it, I get to drink it later in the tap water)?

I'm curious to know where it gets dispersed or stuck (to possibly avoid it)

view more: next ›